How Come Uday's Kid Isn't Really...
 

mentioned much when they talk about taking out Saddams sons?

Uday's 14 year old son was also blown to pieces in those blasts from the helicopter, he was in the house and died with his uncle and father, but I have only seen it mentioned once maybe twice and never really covered.

Pre-emptive strike.

Kill em before they have a chance to turn bad.

I agree, but why don't they ever mention it?

I bet most people don't even know it.

Qusay's kid, not Uday's.

my bad.

:winkwink:

one of em.

I remember it being mentioned early on but I imagine that as time passes on there really is no need to mention it. It's kind of a who cares. The only reason anyone would care is because of the age. No one knew them in life and no one knows them in death.

Probably because the kid was 'innocent' and underage and it puts the US in a negative perspective.

yep

There is no way to prove it but I would bet that he was not as innocent as you would think he was.

Which again, is why I ask, why do they never cover it?

Seems they could easily show what kind of kid he was.

That's why I put innocent between "''"'s. ;)

S.

It's not of any importance anymore. They're dead, let's move on and hunt down more most wanted. Nobody will complain about how it's done, as long as it's done.

It's hard enough convincing people of the basics of whats going on over there. I imagine that it would be even harder to convince people that a 14 year old needed to be killed.

One less problem to deal with if you keep it on the d/l.

Rumsfield?

Yes it's me, son. I'm hacked Seb's account. Now do you fellow Americans a favor and keep you mouth shut. Politics are for people who are afraid to stand up. This is a war, son.

Se.. uh Donald.

Did I express sadness or say anything against the action Sebastian? Did I say this wasn't a war, did I say his death was wrong in any way?

Politics are for people afraid to stand up?

Funny, I am asking why they havent profiled the kid (standing up) and you use a kid-like line like this?

Run along, your TV is calling you.

I can hear my TV already! But what's your point, really? What's your opinion about it?

I have no opinion.

I just wanted to know what the kid was like.

Interested in if he, like the men he died with, was giving a gun at as young age and brought to prisons and told to shoot inmates etc...

I seek knowledge only.

I can't care any less who lives or dies in this world.

I guess they are still afraid about the public response when they would brag about killing a 'defenceless' minor, even if he had killed inmates or innocent people.

The whole world is watching over their shoulders. I know you could face the death penalty in America if you'd kill somebody as a minor, or face life in prison, but that's just the US of A. How would the rest of the world react if they would brag about killing a minor? Would they perhaps stop any military support, or humbly accept the fact that America can kill anyone they want.

Seb.

I am not looking for anyone to brag. But it certainly seems to be being avoided.

You act as if this is THE only minor involved here. They have been showing countless pictures of INJURED kids, children missing legs, and bloody babies, but they can' show a pic of the grandson.

America has proven it can kill whoever it wants, and continues to do so.

This isn't the only kid to die in this war.

There will be more.

Except the ones they're really after. :1orglaugh

Well, we are highlighting out a single kid here aren't we? Of course, there are always war casualties like children, pregnant women and old ladies.

But this is the intentional killing of a child and that is perhaps more important than just a random kid who got hit by a tank grenade or even died from it.

Yes they have proven it. But a war is a dirty game, you know it yourself. Bragging about victories and shutting up about losses is all they do. Are you looking for more objective information about this war? Watch Discovery 4 years from now and find out.

Seb.

well, all I was looking for was a bio on the kid.

So far, no one has said anything.

Curiosity is one of my many faults.

I agree.

So Punky, how do you feel about shooting kids during war?

Shit happens. Anyone who believes any war can be fought without innocents dying is an idiot.

<a href=http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=165363>Our Military Shoots More Accurate Than Storm Troopers But They Always Hit The Wrong...</a>

A little info...

http://www.dawn.com/2003/07/24/top15.htm

A little more... with a middle eastern slant

http://www.almuajaha.com/newswire/di...1055/index.php

It amuses me that Americans think bombing a 14 year old is a good thing.

A nation of scared pussies who revel in killing kids.

With populace like this, it's clear to all that America's days are numbered.

Now *that's* funny.

Even funnier is watching all the sheep here it abject denial. A rude awakening is just around the corner.

:1orglaugh

So there you have it, the killing was selfdefence, how politically correct, LOL. Do you believe it yourself.

S.

'all the kids are fucking dead,
I write with love, and a gun to my head.' - Give Up The Ghost

:)

Kids have been killed in every war in history. Everyone would rather not do it, but there's no way to avoid.
Even you should understand that.

heheh

:thumbsup

Troll

Seems that bush wanna kill all the Sadam's bloodline.

Have we shot the sisters yet or have we allowed them to flee?

It's ignorant to think a women cannot act out revenge.

:)

Probably he wasn't innocent but you cannot claim it.

14 old kids are having sex today, but when you open a non nude "model" site with a 14 old girl, you know what reaction you can expect even on GFY...
Kids are always kids :2 cents:

Probably he wasn't innocent but you cannot claim that.

14 old kids are having sex today, but when you open a non nude "model" site with a 14 y.o girl, you know what reaction you can expect even here, on GFY.

Kids are always kids... :2 cents:

hey money tree dialer guy, can you contact me please.

World would be better if that policy had applied to the " Bush Bloodline"...

Actually the teenage son came out of the house with an ak-47 and unloaded 3 clips into us marines injuring 1 of them. At this point marines opened fire with truck mounted guns and killed him.

Everyone else was killed without actually seeing the targets.

regardless of who shot whom first the plain fact is they surrounded them with hundreds of troops and waited for shots to be fired so they could go inside and murder anyone they wanted. This is the same basic idea in USA ARMED STANDOFF'S with no hostages . The person cant do any real harm if everyone just backed off 200 or so metres, Nobody could get killed and nobody dies, but for some reason they have to surround the house and RUSH in and do something.

What shocks me more is the news yesterday admits the defense department LIED and made the EPA LIE about the air quality in New York After 9/11. They felt it was in the best interest of americans to tell us the air quality was safe when infact it was anything but safe. Now i ask myself why did they need to lie ? What did it help ? Whom did it protect ?

They used the whole "men in black" type ideology that if you told the world the truth they would all freak out.

So its up to the usa to lie to us to keep us protected .. hmmmm

What else are they lying about?

And who the fuck are you to put ALL Americans in the same catagory? What an ignorant thing to say. Nobody said killing a 14 year old was funny.....dumb ass.

And who the fuck are you to put ALL Americans in the same catagory? What an ignorant thing to say. Nobody said killing a 14 year old was a good thing.....dumb ass.

now, that seems to clarify things for me. and besides, i think the Iraqi people would not be to happy about US soldiers killing a teenage boy, that would just worsen the moral of the Saddam supporters.