Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
03-25-2010, 02:22 AM | #1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 545
|
Online Performer Agreement and Age Verification Forms
Can someone please inform me as to why the webcam companies don't allow models to do the Performer Agreement and Age verification forms online? Downloading, completing them, then scanning or faxing them back seems so unnecessary and they probably lose at least 20% of their prospective models in that process. So, there must be a reason that none of them do it.
Real business question. Please enlighten me.
__________________
Email: phuntimes (at) me.com Skype: sjcolle |
03-25-2010, 02:42 AM | #2 |
Too old to care
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
|
Because they can be easily forged and land the web cam company in a ton of shit.
|
03-25-2010, 02:46 AM | #3 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
|
|
03-25-2010, 03:10 AM | #4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 545
|
Thanks for taking care of that one for me Aaron. Can we get some legal input here from someone who actually knows what they are talking about. What's the difference in scanning/faxing back a digital copy of those Performer Agreement forms and storing a digital copy of those same forms that were created online.
__________________
Email: phuntimes (at) me.com Skype: sjcolle |
03-25-2010, 03:13 AM | #5 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
|
Quote:
There is no difference. It's a great feature that should have been available YEARS ago. |
|
03-25-2010, 03:29 AM | #6 |
Too old to care
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
|
It comes down to whether you want to stand in front of a judge and say you had met the girl and checked her ID or whether you want to tell him you accepted what you got in an email.
Your in trouble which ever way, but one is deeper shit than the other. The best person to ask SJCollegeboy, is your attorney. Telling the judge you got advice from me or Aaron will just make the judge even more pissed off. Of course if it's you trying to perform online and no webcam company accepting your screened and faxed ID my answer will do for you. |
03-25-2010, 03:30 AM | #7 |
Too old to care
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
|
Aaron trust me there's a difference when the shit hits the fan. And that's what counts.
|
03-25-2010, 03:35 AM | #8 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
|
Quote:
The hell there is. Option A: Model faxes in her ID. Option B: Model scans her ID and attaches it to an online form. Neither option allows the webcam company to see the original ID. BOTH options include the EXACT same risk. It doesn't take a law degree to figure this out...Just a little common sense. |
|
03-25-2010, 03:39 AM | #9 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
|
In fact....A 300dpi scan of a models ID is MUCH clearer than a faxed copy any day of the week. Because of this fact alone, an online system would provide better quality images of ID's and make for much easier detection of fakes.
If you argue with that then you're a tool. |
03-25-2010, 04:29 AM | #10 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,746
|
hey there i think you need to use your coconut head........
|
03-25-2010, 04:48 AM | #11 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
03-25-2010, 04:59 AM | #12 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I should mention one further item: 2257 systems on cam sites have evolved immensely since late 2008 (with many more requirements to maintain compliance). That said, they are quite advanced and log nearly every activity that ever happens on the site (clips of every session (if not the full sessions themselves), recorded chats, videos, uploaded pictures, chat logs (even in free text chat), etc...) with these items being recorded, organized, and indefinitely stored via automation.
I'll plug my own product here as VCMS (see sig) comes with such a 2257 back-end (and, we know of no other platform that currently comes with this module as a standard feature). FYI, just trying to be of help and provide a coherent background of what should actually exist to keep everything in order. |
03-25-2010, 05:06 AM | #13 |
I help you SUCCEED
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,194
|
Authentication issues. You're on to something though. Maybe in a few years with more advances in facial recognition software technology along with legislative support, this might be a reality.
It would definitely make a lot of other business transactions smoother, faster, and cheaper. |
03-25-2010, 06:33 AM | #14 | |
Too old to care
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
|
Quote:
My count is 3 and having done all you can to verify the models ages is a plus. The prosecution will use what ever they can to make you look like the bad guy. It's just great when your defense council can counter their arguments. It's all about when the shit hits the fan. |
|
03-25-2010, 11:22 AM | #15 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
|
Quote:
We are not talking about YOU verifying a models ID. We are talking about WEBCAM sites and faxed/mailed in COPIES of ID's. COPIES...As in NOT THE ORIGINAL ID IN THE FIRST PLACE. Instead of standing in front of another judge, you may want to consider buying a book on reading comprehension. |
|
03-25-2010, 11:29 AM | #16 | |
Too old to care
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
|
Quote:
Mo one in the court will care about what is convenient for you. They will care about you taking all necessary steps to verify a model for porn work though. I would of thought after all your years as a shooter you would realise what some girls/guys will do to earn a few dollars modeling. I'm done debating with this. I just hope no one here ever has to prove they did their utmost and not the most convenient. |
|
03-25-2010, 11:32 AM | #17 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
|
Quote:
There is no REAL debate here. The OP asked a question about apples and you are discussing oranges. In the webcam world, the webcam site operators NEVER see the original docs in the first place. What part of this are you having difficulty understanding? |
|
03-25-2010, 11:32 AM | #18 |
HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane
Posts: 20,419
|
this would be a good time to mention 2257safe.com for KB...
that shit can protect you from everything, including aids... and forgery........ . |
03-25-2010, 11:35 AM | #19 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
|
Quote:
And I would think that after 103 year of living that you would understand the difference between a model in your studio with ID in hand vs. a model 8,000 miles away who is required to fax or mail her ID. Since you seem to have a way to verify original ID's from 8k miles away, perhaps you would like to share the details of this amazing feat with the rest of us? |
|
03-25-2010, 11:37 AM | #20 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
|
Quote:
Shameless spam that is WAY off topic. Fake ID's faxed in are still fake ID's. Putting them in 2257safe.com's system doesn't make them valid. |
|
03-25-2010, 11:37 AM | #21 |
Such Fun!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,900
|
I would say there is a simple reason, this springs to my mind anyway.
If it is all done digitally/online, how can you sign it properly? If you download a model release/agreement and fill it out on the computer, how do you then sign it? unless you have a tablet there is no way of doing it. And by signing it I mean a proper signature using your own handwriting and a pen. Not just printing your name. |
03-25-2010, 11:39 AM | #22 |
HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane
Posts: 20,419
|
|
03-25-2010, 11:48 AM | #23 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
|
Quote:
I've seen webcam companies who ask you to fax it in to get started then they ask you to follow up by mailing the original doc for the very reason you mention. The topic is model convenience and getting up and running. A digital system is simply faster, less resources required, and the original signed hardcopy can still be mailed if needed. |
|
03-25-2010, 11:48 AM | #24 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐
Posts: 46,909
|
|
03-25-2010, 11:56 AM | #25 | |
Such Fun!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,900
|
Quote:
|
|
03-25-2010, 05:08 PM | #26 |
null
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9,820
|
Interesting info In This Thread
|
|
|||||||
Bookmarks |
Tags |
age verification, legal, webcam |
Thread Tools | |