GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Women prefer a 'feminine' appearance in partners...

Page 2 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - Women prefer a 'feminine' appearance in partners... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=758492)

jono	08-09-2007 07:05 AM

Thats me screwed

Naja-ram

08-09-2007 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bausch (Post 12899257)

Uh.. what country are you from? Because here in America plenty of women PROVIDE FOR THEMSELVES and some EVEN PROVIDE FOR THEIR HUSBANDS and a lot DO NOT WANT a man to provide for them. Ok?

news flash honey: taking money from the husbands pucket while he sleeps is not called "PROVIDE FOR THEMSELVES".
or saying to her man: "please buy me a car" - thatt's not "PROVIDE FOR THEMSELVES".either.

Naja-ram

08-09-2007 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash (Post 12901407)

I love the assumption that just because a man may have more feminine features (something he really can't control) that he must be bad in bed. Also, I can't be the only woman here that just got the urge to punch Naja-ram (albeit an obvious act).

what's the matter girl ? can't deal with the truth so you want to punch me ?
violence is the key for a feminist.
why don't you be proud of what you are.
you are a girl - that is not a bad thing as long as you know your place.

maxjohan

08-09-2007 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doctor Dre (Post 12895121)

They preffer a feminine partner but they want a macho man fucking them.

Yeah to a point that's true but personally I don't fall flat on my face for women that are very feminine. And I don't walk around town thinking about fucking a feminine woman. LOL

Anyways, if you look for women who are true to themself and are self-aware, then you will never have a problem with them falling for the macho-man.

:)

Zester

08-09-2007 07:17 AM

isn't this the "passionate affair type guy" and the "marring type guy" recycled ?
you know, when the nerd is the one that you marry and the muscle dude is the one you cheat with ?

Naja-ram

08-09-2007 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash (Post 12901407)

IAlso, I can't be the only woman here that just got the urge to punch Naja-ram (albeit an obvious act).

https://youtube.com/watch?v=LYxJ8V_0ktw

.

sniperwolf

08-09-2007 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pimpporn (Post 12901411)

I'm from Chicago but live in Scottsdale now. In Chicago, "good looking" macho guys get the most attention from women. In Scottsdale, "good looking" metro and bi-sexual wimpy guys get the most attention from women. Quite a contrast.

Yes, I believed that it always depends on the place, its culture specifically. I live here in an Asian country and the norm nowadays is that metrosexual men are very attractive to women. Those men who dresses well, smells good, smooth and fine faces. That's the trend now.

tomeatsdinner

08-09-2007 08:21 AM

Some women might want feminine man for longer relationship.. But looks can deceive anyone.. Anyone can cheat if they want too...

*Fred*

08-09-2007 08:49 AM

The study also shows that women prefer older looking guys. :thumbsup

BlackCrayon

08-09-2007 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baal.PitBull (Post 12897755)

The "norm" for human cultures is for the male to have as many wives as he can support. Its a natural fact! Look at any living organism. The males mate with as many females as possible to reproduce. It is only the strong influence of christianity that prohibits this. Left to nature a man should have as many "wives" as he is able to "support for" and "fight for".

Whats far more complexing is that even in the bible many of the heros had multiple wives. Yet today?

To say its natural for men to have many partners and not women is just silly. Women can fuck over and over and over again and not have to wait to get hard again. Its been proven that sperm will basically fight sperm from another man inside a woman to get to the egg which shows women were not meant to be monogamous either.

M0nk	08-09-2007 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jarmusch (Post 12895592)

This must be the ultimate man - feminine, yet manly:

http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k1...f_029/mob5.jpg

ahhrggrg whats that!!!!:repuke

alby_persignup

08-09-2007 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash (Post 12897140)

Let's work on that little skin problem first.

damn! thats disgusting!

Skillz Unlimited

08-09-2007 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Egypt[4TH-Reactor] (Post 12895203)

Not a shock definitely.

Plus I think it's fair, because for centuries women have been looking after themselves, trying to be more attractive, trying to be up to date in fashion and looks... Why shouldn't men do the same thing? :upsidedow

For example in the 20th-21st centuries men started to look after their bodies, working our in the gyms, tracking their meals. A lot of men are doing these things now. Why not add the other things to our armory? Why not taking care of skin, haircut, nails? Not too much of course, but they can be neat and good looking.

And one more example - in medieval times men took bath once a month. Shall we do the same thing nowadays? I doubt... :upsidedow

So it's just evolution, progress... however you call it :upsidedow

Fag................

Brother Bilo

08-09-2007 10:56 AM

Hey, my Mom raised me and my brother by herself including putting herself through college. She's had sporatic boyfriends here and there, but she didn't need a guy. I think what ends up happening with women who are that self sufficient is that they start to resent when a man tries to do something for them. Just an inside opinion.

bausch

08-09-2007 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naja-ram (Post 12901424)

Let's just say I know women who paid for their Mercedes in CASH and also have supported their boyfriends while the the guy was going through rough times (paid the bills 100 percent and also helping the guy out with his credit card bills etc) while making six figures a year. And also actually loaned money to the bf to help HIM buy a car.

You do not consider this PROVIDING FOR THEMSELVES AND MORE?

bausch

08-09-2007 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baal.PitBull (Post 12901267)

What is your definition of plenty? and what do you call providing for themselves? Sorry to say that a single mother filling out welfare papers for her 3-4 illegit kids is not providing for themselves. Those are MY tax dollars providing for her. And plenty and normal are not equal. Plenty for you might be 1:1000 the NORM would be 600+:1000.

Again let me refresh your mammory in case you forgot.

Providing for themselves and making a decent living to me making six figures a year (to me that's good because it's comfortable and allows you to have savings in case something happens), I know plenty of women that do make six figures. I guess most people could live on 60-70k a year or whatever, but I say when a woman makes over six figures she's doing pretty good for herself. It's a lot higher than the national average household in the U.S and I know plenty of women that make six figures.

bausch

08-09-2007 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baal.PitBull (Post 12901267)

So plenty to me is over six figures.

I would say if a woman makes over 40k a year or so she could support herself fine (it's just not comfortable, at least not to me), but anyone, male or female making up to and over 6 figures is doing ok. It also depends on where you live. If you live in NY or CA you definitely need over 100k a year.

BlackCrayon

08-09-2007 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bausch (Post 12902705)

Please, you know you are only talking about yourself.

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:22 AM.

Page 2 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page