50 scandalous hoes

Yes because the rapist is going to stand perfect still and let you shoot them in the leg. Chances are if you shoot at someone they are going to be moving. And such you might actually shoot them in the head. How come everyone things head shot are never accidental? Hell chances are I'd aim for the foot and hit his head.

This guy has got it right.

The woman is done. Shes getting manslaughter. There is no need to argue about that. Whats going to get drawn out in the courts, is his defense of justification.

Assistant District Attorney Sean Colston declined to comment on specifics of the case or the grand jury proceedings but said Texas law allows a defendant to claim justification if he has "a reasonable belief that his actions are necessary, even though what they believe at the time turns out not to be true.

but hey, what do i know? I wasnt there, im just getting the info from CNN.

yeah, i can read you goofy cunt. ... and you know the full circumstances. you know whether or not he thought his wife was being kidnapped by a rapist and you know what shots he had and you know that he could have just as easily shot a guy in the leg in a moving fucking vehicle because you're a fucking psychic who knows all the details that the grand jury, reporter and jesus christ himself doesn't.

This went on in Texas and they have a "right to kill" law. And it doesn't only apply to inside your house. And no grand jury is going to charge and no jury is going to convict this guy and set a precedent where your "right to kill" might be questioned. As I said this is Texas.

Ironic thing is that if she was being raped and her boyfriend/husband just stood there asking "Are you sure you're being raped? I need to make sure you really aren't cheating on me." She'd kill him.

rofl... that's some funny shit right there.

I agree with you Jane

Most likely this dipshit knew his wife wasnt being raped nad that this guy was just banging her fucking brains out

he murdered him anyway

I have been in a similar situation where a jealous husband fired shots at me and the wife told me that he said he would have just told the police he thought I was raping her

fuckin tool I hope they fry his ass

by the way... most guys with cheating wives know or have a suspect the whore is cheating anyway

this sounds like he set them up to me

he made her believe he would not be back soon so he could catch her in the act with the " gun he happen to have"

If you were screwing another man's wife, you deserved every bullet that came your way. :thumbsup

when are you going to come out the closet??? thats the real question here??

seriously

I mean you do know its ok to be gay... we want laugh at you shit as a matter of fact boy alley one of the most captivating personalities on this board

so why dont you come on out???

dont supress your wanting asshole any longer

So? by me stating the obvious -- that you deserved being shot at for screwing another man?s wife ? that makes me gay? Your logic is flawless! We have a fucking genius among us, praise be the intellect of pussyserver!

Though I do have to change one thing, if I caught you fucking my wife I?d just beat the fuck out of you with my fists. I don?t believe in using guns to solve our differences. I think a nice fist fight is a much better way to get your point across. I mean how much effort does it take to shoot someone? Almost none at all. You actually have to put work into beating the shit out of someone.

A women is cheating on her husband with the UPS guy, he catches the 2 and shes cries rape. So the husband shots the man in the head.

Now this is fucked up big time :disgust

It is normal thing to shoot a guy in bed of your wife no matter is she just cheating husband or rape.Of course murder still should be avoided but in moment like that you cannot think.

thats quite a funny statement. so screwing someone elses wife is ok? is that right or wrong? so that guy who died doesn't deserved to be shoot in the head instead in the foot or where ever? lol i hope some people here is in that situation. they won't probably knew what they can do or what they would do in that situation..

it would do with others not all though.. if im in that situation i wouldn't know what will i do.. but probably shoot that fucker in the head. lol :2 cents:

No, screwing someone else?s wife is NOT ok, of course it is wrong. Anyone who does that deserves whatever they get, be it a shot to the head or the foot or in the balls. Although I?d prefer it not to end in death, I can completely understand why someone in the heat of the moment is going to choose to pull a gun and try to kill the person.

I couldn?t see myself shooting someone with a gun unless it was rape. If it was my wife having an affair I wouldn?t shoot the guy, sure I?d beat the fuck out of him but I couldn?t shoot him. Though I am glad I don?t have any handguns at all because I would still be tempted? Hopefully I?d have enough sense to just beat the fucker black and blue rather than go try and get a rifle or shotgun out of the gun safe LOL.

a persons point of view reveals a lot about that person......

most likely your wife is fucking around on you and or sucking up the UPS guy for you to feel this way

me on the other hand, if I caight my wife cheating I would pull out a HD cam and setup a live feed

I mean what kinda man kills a man over a woman in 2007 ... a woman who dosent give a fuck about you to begin with I might add?/

you are the weakest link

but why blame the other guy for your wife's infidelity???

I dont get it

why is the guy wrong in this situation, he never made a promise to you,, you have never paid his bills or fucked him

why blame the guy?? I dont think the guy deserves to be beat up or shot

Far be it for me to tell you who you should or shouldn't fuck but if you're going to play the game you should be prepared to accept the risks.

First and foremost, it's never a good idea to fuck another man's wife - especially in Texas of all places - on his property.

Come on, this isn't rocket science.

If you're going to insist on rubbing the man's face in it you should be prepared to deal with his, shall we say, less than rational response.

Give the dude a chance to cool down by forcing him to drive 10 miles or so to the motel he's finally figured out that you're using.

Hey, if nothing else he'll be less likely to beat the rap even if he still elects to blow your conniving ass away :thumbsup

Exactly :boyalley

women who cry rape should get life in prision IMO.

when i was in college i dated this wack job chick. she called me one time and said that if i do not get back together with her, she will call the cops and say I raped her... luckly me and my friend were video taping shit and i recorded the conversion.

no you are idiot.

when it is on its on, you dont have time to fuckin aim and shoot you fuckin idiot.

a girl is being "raped" and the guy doesnt deserve to be shot in the head?

he died because the woman lied not because he was pissed off, he was saving his wife, i hope you find a husband that when you are in times of need he uses to same judgement as you would like this guy to use and see what happens to you. :2 cents:

damn, that's crazy!

No, no, no...she wants him to run and get the neighbors so they can watch her being raped too

I agree with you.

Are you that fucking stupid? Did you even read the article?
It wasn't a situation where the husband killed him then made it up about the rape.
THE WIFE cried rape.
THE WIFE told police she was being raped.
THE WIFE was charged with filing a false police report once they found out it wasn't rape.

I'm wondering if the people here all worked up about the guy getting shot in the head have actually ever fired a gun.

it's not like that's an easy shot to make... even at a relatively close range.

More than likely, the husband was just shooting in the general direction of the guy - grouping a few shots together, as someone trained in the use of a firearm might tend to do - and one bullet happened to hit the head.

:2 cents:

The guy was fleeing.

The husband shot him out of revenge, not because he felt that he was posing a threat.

That'd depend on whether or not the wife was still in the truck, and the article's a bit fuzzy there, I think.

I mean, if his wife was crying "rape!" as the guy's driving off with her in a truck, you gotta wonder what would be the point of carrying a gun if not to use in that exact situation?

Either way, it seems he's been acquitted, so his peers don't feel he's done any wrong.

And again, for those that haven't been properly educated on firearms use...


If you pull a gun, you've already made the decision to put someone down.

Shooting out tires, and hitting someone in the kneecap as they're running away might make for good movie fodder - but, in reality, the gun is a lethal tool - not a magic wand.

Since he was carrying the sidearm, I'd assume that he's had formal training... therefore, he wouldn't have pulled the gun if he hadn't already decided to put the guy down, likely ending his life in the process.

Jane, I have to say, as someone that was a reserve deputy sheriff for a couple of years... It is obvious to me that you have no idea of the effect of firearms on a person. I'm guessing you've never even fired a gun, but simply take you knowledge from Hollywood movies.

People most often don't stop when you shoot them in the leg.
You CAN'T shoot someone in the leg when they are in a car.
Pointing a gun at someone does NOT make them stop whatever they are doing in most cases.
It is VERY difficult to aim perfectly when you are in a stress situation, which is why even well trained police officers have to fire their weapon many times in order to be certain that they effectively stop someone, once the situation calls for deadly force. This is also why they aim for center mass, meaning chest, OR when the suspect only has their head exposed, then you are to aim at that.
You have no idea from this report where everyone involved was, at the time of the shooting.... was the woman in the cab of the truck when the "rapist" was trying to drive off? In that case, the husband took the correct action to prevent a rape turning into a kidnapping. WE JUST DON'T KNOW.

(however, the grand jury heard the evidence, so they do)

:2 cents:

Like I give a flying fuck what you people think. You can think what you want, but I do not have to agree. If you think the husband was justified then good for you. I do not agree, but I am also not going to argue about it. It is stupid to argue about it since none of us are actually involved in the case.

You are the fucked up one. You seem to think you know the whole story and you don't. The only cunt in this forum is you. Perhaps you should be shot for being a retard. Why are you even on this forum, you have no links to adult sites. Are you even in adult? If not take your surfer ass to another place.

I am sorry, JaneB, but with all due respect, I do not agree with your assessment. It all comes down to the actual moment...when in such a moment, your ability to make the most logical decision is thrown out the window, and raw instinct takes over. In the case of a human being, our instinct is to destroy those who invade upon our property...it is entrenched into the human psyche to consider a female to be the "property" of the male (this is also why males fight over females, and why females look to males as the "protector"). If a rival male invades this property, it is in our nature to kill that rival male. It's very basic instinct that we all have. Females have it too, but I don't know if it's to the same extent when it comes to mating partners (it certainly applies to their children though...females will naturally defend their children to the death from invaders, up to and including slaying said invaders). While our society has taught us different things (equalism, for example, a concept I live my life by...no one person is anyone else's property, we should all have equal rights), our basic nature remains unchanged. This being said, at the moment of truth, the guy did what nature dictated, and destroyed the rival male who invaded his property. Society may not agree with this course of action, and we could sit here and point fingers all day long and talk about what he could have done differently, but as a person who not only understands this basic instinct but has taken life before on the street, I simply cannot agree with you when you say that he should have done something different. But it is by no means an insult to you or a degredation of your opinions and beliefs.

I respect your opinion. Like I said we do not have to agree. I just think it is stupid that people resort to name calling when you disagree with them on here. We all have a right to our own opinions.

everyone is telling you that you are totally clueless and taking the time to explain to you why (some in considerable detail)... and you think its me with the problem.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

janeburgess = janedumbass

I think you guys are a little hard on Jane.. this is a complicated matter with several people and emotions involved and it seems everyone has some blame on them:
The wife: Not the smartest person having an affair in front of her house inside a truck at or around the time when she would normally expect her hb to come home..then she cries rape (and knows her hubby carries a gun and probably knows that he will use the gun) - Guily as charged.
The Hubby: Cming home from poker night, probably a little drunk.. sees the wife in the truck with a home boy, she cries rape..his instinct is to shoot the perp even as he is trying to escape, possible still with the wifey in the vehicle.. most likely wifey left the vehicle though.. Hubby got to be a little short on change.. c'mon who cant tell the difference between rape and wife getting her brains screwed out..most likely his emotions took over, he'd probably have shot the perp even if wifey hadnt cried rape.
The perp: There is a reason he works for UPS and not a blinky webmaster..yep you guessed it, he just aint to smart. Hooking up with a married broad at her place..and being in texas everyone carries a gun.. how stupid can you be.. did he deserve what he got, no way but its natures way of making the next generation just that tad bit more intelligent.

The bottomline: have you considered that it could be the hubby shot the guy from jealousy (she never cried rape..). then agreed with wifey she should claim rape to get him off..it seems pretty obvious to me. but hubby/wifey didnt consider the fact that the DA would go after the wife..ironic isnt it.

the bottom line.... is that no one knows exactly what happened, exactly what verbal exchange occured, exactly how people were positioned at the time of the shooting and what exactly the shooter was thinking when he shot, what view he had of the driver, how far away he was from teh driver, what kind of gun he had, whether the head shot was intentional etc etc etc.

thats the ONLY point i have tried to make.

YOU guys are making assumptions.. then making statements about whats right and wrong based on baseless, unsupported assumptions. I am not assuming anything. I understand that i don't have enough information to make a judgement on the situation.

making remarks that he was wrong, he should have done this... should have done that is a little silly because there are not enough details to make any judgements whatsoever. furthermore, a grand jury WAS provided enough details to make judgements... and they decided that the woman was in the wrong and responsble for the mans death as the direct result of her actions.

thats the problem with women... emotional. blah blah blah.. about nothing, saying nothing, with no facts to back anything up.. the discussion at hand however, is about facts.

Three sides to that story. His version, Hers, and the Truth

good stupid bitch deserves it.

That is the fucking stupidest thing I have ever heard.

You tards watch way too much tv / movies...I hear you tards talk about how cops should shoot guns out of perps hands etc...just like they do in the movies...now you're claiming this guy should be shot in the leg.

Let's say for example the guy is actually a rapist and he's carrying a weapon and you try to shoot for a target as small as a leg and miss...and now he has his weapon centered on you.

This is why when you learn to fire a weapon, you learn to shoot at "center mass," meaning the torso and in particular the chest area...this gives you the largest target that does the most damage stopping them...and another thing for you "shoot them in the legs" tards...you do realize there is a major artery running through the leg right? Hit that and you kill them anyway...a shot to the leg does not necessarily mean life saving.

God, please just abort yourself...no..wait...someone breaking into your house will do that when you start aiming your gun at their leg.

(Texas law allows a defendant to claim justification if he has "a reasonable belief that his actions are necessary, even though what they believe at the time turns out not to be true.")

Texas is very lenient when it comes to firearms. In the state I live in even self defense is very circumstantial. If an UNARMED man is caught breaking into my house and I shoot him. I would most likely be charged with manslaughter. If he had his hands around my neck at the time I would not.

You can't mix moralistic issues with legal ones. That is the reason we have law enforcement. If it was left up to us to make decisions in these types of situations there would be a lot more dead men and women :2 cents:

No I did not sat you had a problem, I said why are you even in here? You have no porn links, no sig, so you are not in adult. In case you have not noticed it is for people in adult. Not for surfers like yourself. No one on here likes sufers.

Whatever surfer. Another asshole with no real sig, or links to any companies. It is time to get the admin to kick the surfers off here. They don't belong on a porn forum if they don't work in porn.

MetaMan = Porn groupie

http://www.punditguy.com/images/SCWeBad.jpg

That's Right....That's Right....We BAD!

what a fucking whore.

she deserves it!

just think of the new commercials.