|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
04-16-2002, 07:57 AM
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 1,151
|
Supreme Court Decides "Virtual Child POrn" case
|
|
|
|
04-16-2002, 08:01 AM
|
#2 |
|
Suck it!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Who wants to know?
Posts: 4,432
|
Not that I condone CP or the depiction of it, but this decision is a good thing for us in general.
 |
|
|
|
|
04-16-2002, 08:05 AM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: -CANADA-
Posts: 1,464
|
I agree with the decision.
|
|
|
|
|
04-16-2002, 08:13 AM
|
#4 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 589
|
Personally I dont agree with simulated child-porn but I wouldnt hesitate spending a day in court to defend someone else's right to view it. As long as all parties involved are consenting adults I dont think its anyone's right to tell them what they can or cannot enjoy no matter how fucking sick it makes me.
__________________
Adult Web Marketing Specialist with 10 years of Industry Experience - CONTACT ME |
|
|
|
|
04-16-2002, 08:57 AM
|
#5 |
|
Suck it!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Who wants to know?
Posts: 4,432
|
Exactly!!
__________________
  
|
|
|
|
|
04-16-2002, 09:03 AM
|
#6 |
|
Not making A Comeback
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,218
|
to be able to be prosecuted for shooting a 20 year old and portraying her in shoolclothes with an apple and saying she's 17 is a bit much i think.... it's not cool to be encouraging under-age "appreciation" but then again i think it's silly to be able to be prosecuted for filming a 17 year old who you could legally FUCK.. then again we're talking tounger... eh.. i guess this means we'll be seeing a lot of 3dsmax and maya kiddie porn..... blech..... fake nude 12 year olds... how low can the human race get for a few fucking $$ eh....
|
|
|
|
