|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: EARTH (for the time being)
Posts: 7,014
|
ROFL... IBM Owned! Judge Rules Pension Plan Hurt Workers
If IBM don't win on appeal they are OWNED for billions of bucks
------- Thursday, February 19, 2004 Judge rules pension plan hurt IBM workers The Associated Press NEW YORK -- IBM Corp. owes back payments -- possibly worth billions of dollars -- to 140,000 older employees who were harmed when the technology giant converted to a new kind of pension plan in the 1990s, a federal judge ruled. The plaintiffs in the case want IBM to make up for what they lost after the company adopted a ''cash balance'' pension plan, which pays workers a lump sum when they leave the company. A federal judge had ruled last July that the plan amounted to age discrimination because it unfairly penalized older employees. IBM argued that it should not be forced to make retroactive payments because it could not have foreseen that the judge, G. Patrick Murphy of U.S. District Court in East St. Louis, Ill., would declare the cash balance plan illegal. But in a ruling dated Feb. 12, Murphy wrote that IBM had no justification for claiming it was blindsided by his decision. ''The prohibition against age discrimination existed long before the appearance of cash balance plans,'' Murphy wrote. ''All that has changed is IBM's clever, but ineffectual, response to law that it finds too restrictive for its business model.'' Murphy has yet to decide the damages IBM should pay or how the figure will be calculated. Under one formula suggested by the plaintiffs, IBM has estimated the payments would total $6 billion. IBM spokeswoman Kendra Collins said IBM expects to win the case on appeal. |
|
|
|