50 bribed frenchmen

The world would be a sad place if we all felt like you. What happnens to the people who die in the bombings?

Oh I forgot, they don't matter because they are foreigners, right?

What is somewhat ironic is that I imagine the exremists that attacked the USA feel exactly the same as you do. Kill them all, they're evil deep down anyway.

Pardon me, did the United States not violate the UN by going into Iraq? What are the consequences of that?

Again, ironically, neither was the invasion.

So are you gonna invade all countries who fail to comply with UN resolutions now?

Sure as long as they pose a threat.

There was no chance that Saddam was gonna do something stupid, he's not that crazy. Problem is that powerfull countries are left alone because they actually are a danger.

This is now on my top two list of stupidest fucking things I have ever heard my life. He's not that crazy? He thinks he's related to Jesus, he promised the mother of all wars in 91 and yet his army gave like cowards, his sons were rapists and murderers. He gassed his own people. He tortured his own people. That's not crazy? No my friend, the threat isn't powerful countries left alone. The threat is that evil will always prevail when good men sit by and do nothing.


Last I checked Iraqis wheren't begging for help. Poor people in Congo are begging for help because 4 million of them have been slaughtered and nobody cares.

They've been begging for help for years but that is irrelevant. The war wasn't about them begging for help. I've noticed you have a bad habit of trying to make things up. Are you aware of this?

And people in the Congo? Ok, so what are you doing about it? You talk a good game but I don't see you do anything about it. But let me got this straight. So now your argument is that we shouldn't have attacked Iraq because if we're not gonna help everyone that asks for help than we shouldn't help anyone at all?

I have to ask. We're you born a tard or is it something you've developed over time?

Why oh why do people as closed minded as you say things like that.

Why do free countries like the USA, UK, Australia and a bunch of others need to warrant taking a man out of power that has been torturing and killing his OWN people for decades.

HUH ???

WHY !!!!!!!

All the is necessary for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke

Well Saddam posed no threat and even Powell said on February 2001 that Saddam wasn't even able to threaten his neighbours with conventional weapons. Seriously, if Saddam is a threat then who isn't? Let's declare war on all countries then.

Bush thinks God is telling him which countries to invade.
He never tried to invade the US. So why are you doing nothing against the countries who are an actual threat?

What makes you think that I'm in favor of an intervention in Congo? I'm saying that unlike the Iraqis, people in Congo are begging for help and the guy in North Korea have 400k slaves and I can go on and on yet what is being done? Are they being freed?

At least I don't throw childish insults.

AbulletAwayGoneBad, you're obviously theking, or broke, or 12clicks, or one of the right wing nuts on this board. Why keep making fake names, you just look dumber and dumber every time. Saying you went into Iraq because of UN resolutions is laughable, so is saying you went their to help the people. Do you even know which resolutions they were breaking? No, you don't, or else you wouldn't open your mouth about it. Notice even Bush isn't stupid enough to use that as an excuse? Wake up you fucking tool, you're bullshit is never going to change anyone's opinion.

loryn I love you. one more reason to hate the french :winkwink:

Do you hate Jews and blacks to?

Since you ignored my comments, I will again point out how the USA went against the UN when they invaded Iraq.

How can you (And the speechwriters) now tout this as a reason for invasion? Is it simply grasping at straws to be able to pull out something?

Since when was the USA a great champion of the UN? Certainly not in recent history.

I never said the US went to war to defend the UN. And I don't think it's been said the US went to war for that. What I did say was that the reason we did invade Iraq was because they failed to follow the UN resolutions. And since those UN resolutions were there because of the US's involvement back in '91 it was only logical that the US would be the one's enforcing them. The UN wasn?t doing anything effective in enforcing them so we stepped in.

And I think once the US was a "Great Champion" of the UN. But over the years it has just turned to shit and serves no real purpose. It's a waste of money for the US. The UN is constantly talking about how important they are but fail to act on anything.

I agree with you. The UN did NOTHING when Iraq violated the resolutions. Action was necessary, and nothign was done. Re-organization and reassesment of the body is definately in order.

I also agree with you that people LOVE attacking the largest power in the world. It IS difficult to orchestrate a country's foreign policy with everyone out for your blood.

But is obvious our opinions differ on the other issues. :)

I love happy endings :D

I always thought the UN has such a great potential do the world some good. But I think it's failing miserably. I agree with you they should do some reorganizing. It just seems like most people involved with it are afraid to do anything. Right or wrong, decisions should be made. But they can't even seem to make decision. It's a shame.

I know. They can really make you enjoy hating them. I think they like it.

And as for you.................................:Graucho

Hey Hey Hey, don't put the Jews and Black in the same category as those crazy people.

We are all one big happy family, except for the French. :1orglaugh

You're some kind of a new KKK sect?

to all french hater :321GFY
im french-canadian and proud of it
so you went to war against a 3rd country world because of some not respected UN resolution ?
did i forgot to mention Israel doesnt respect UN resolution ?
did i forgot to mention that Israel have the nuke ?
did i forgot to mention that kill innocent people everyday ?
so what the fuck are you doing in iraq ?

Je t'aime :)

I think a lot of people are going to be surprised about what was known and not know by Bush and the boys before going into Iraq and I mean in a positive way for this administration. A lot of lefties are going to be eating crow when the campaign gets into full swing.

:2 cents:

Do you live in FRANCE????? Do you live by their laws???? NO so shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!

:thumbsup

Are you one of those politically correct freaks??

Reread my statement with a smile and a little laugh. It was meant as comedy. You know like comedians on Comedy Central. You know HUMOR. I love Tough Crowd with Collin Quinn. Maybe you should watch that and light up a little. GEESH!!

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by skillfull
to all french hater
im french-canadian and proud of it
so you went to war against a 3rd country world because of some not respected UN resolution ?
did i forgot to mention Israel doesnt respect UN resolution ?
did i forgot to mention that Israel have the nuke ?
did i forgot to mention that kill innocent people everyday ?
so what the fuck are you doing in iraq ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Wow,

First the UN resolution under the terms and conditions of surrender by Saddam were broken every single day. The U.S. had every right to go in under those resolutions, never mind the last one that was signed on to.

Second, the UN resolution that Israel is supposedly not agreeing to after being attacked from within its country and by the outside Arab countries again has never been adhered to by the Palestinians. The agreement said that all hostilities would have to cease, so unless the attacks against Israel stop, they have the right to continue on with the occupation and are technically still at war.

Third, some people just don't get it. There is a HUGE difference between killing military type people and indiscriminantly blowing up anyone in sight. Between taking as many precautions as possible while disposing of a ruthless suicide killer and accidentally harming others and between going into the first house you find and shooting a 5 year old in the head.

Fourth, Clinton and the U.S. had to go cleanup Europes back yard in the balkans because they couldn't handle it themselves withou any U.N. resolution. No one said shit then.

Last but not least my understanding of the American Civil war and many others were started for reasons other than humane acts for an oppressed people. But I'm sure there isn't an black person in the U.S. or a sane Iraqi that is not going to be happy to be as free as one can be in this world.

P.S. Israel has nukes, fantastic. We need them in place to protect our interests. Someone has to have the big gun on the block to keep things in check. Who decides who gets Nukes? the same type of people who decide whether or not I should be able to have a grenade in my house. Does it make sense for every dumb fuck to have a grenade? Nope, I don't think so.

Thanks for wasting some time on my rant.

Just my :2 cents:

what's priceless is people like you saying "invading Iraq is not about oil" but "the frenchies? - whoah ALL ABOUT OIL".
domestic blindness at it's best.

FERME TA GUEULE PUTAIN DE FRANCAIS DE MERDE

LES FRANCAIS ADORENT LA BITE ARABE DANS LEURS CULS DE TAPETTES.

JE T'EMMERDES TOI ET TOUS LES PEDES DE FRANCAIS.

FERMES TA GROSSE GUEULE !!!

Let's bomb saddam, or is it to late?

It's ALL about money you nonces.... otherwise Saudi Arabia would be a sheet of glass. My country, your country their country. we're no better than each other. I hope Australia's new contruction and oil contracts were worth it. At least none of our soldiers died for our cut of the loot.

go take a bath frenchie.

Hey Mic;
Why don't you shut the fuck up and take your dick out of that kangaroo's ass? :321GFY

No they don't, not without approval of the security council.

Quote:

Second, the UN resolution that Israel is supposedly not agreeing to after being attacked from within its country and by the outside Arab countries again has never been adhered to by the Palestinians. The agreement said that all hostilities would have to cease, so unless the attacks against Israel stop, they have the right to continue on with the occupation and are technically still at war.

Actually there is more than one resolution they're not adhering to. Besides, it's the occupation that started the mess.

Quote:

Last but not least my understanding of the American Civil war and many others were started for reasons other than humane acts for an oppressed people. But I'm sure there isn't an black person in the U.S. or a sane Iraqi that is not going to be happy to be as free as one can be in this world.

Actually I happen to know a few Iraqis who didn't like loosing there country.

Quote:

P.S. Israel has nukes, fantastic. We need them in place to protect our interests. Someone has to have the big gun on the block to keep things in check. Who decides who gets Nukes? the same type of people who decide whether or not I should be able to have a grenade in my house. Does it make sense for every dumb fuck to have a grenade? Nope, I don't think so. Thanks for wasting some time on my rant. Just my :2 cents:

I think every country should have nukes, that way no more fucking around and invading weak countries here and there.

Actually you summed up what he was saying.

Its all about the Evil Money Hungry Americans. Those bastards have no morals at all, every decision made is signed in blood and everyone in the government wants to fuck as many people as possible. Everything you see is a lie, coverup and evil act. There isn't a single act of good will coming out of the States didn't you know.

They are the devil looking to squash eveyone in sight like an ant, diabolique to the core.

Not

No actually that wouldn't be so bad. Many of them wanted the oil control but Bush have much more sinister plans, he's a a religious extremist who believes that God gave him a mission.

whatever frenchie. keep yapping you self hating french poodle.

Roger your facts are incorrect on each of those points except the first one, but it will take a lot of time to bring the actual resolutions into this forum, time that I don't have right at this second.


I will say this, when a country surrenders and signs the terms and conditions of the surrender and doesn't follow them, they are still at war. The U.N. failed to enforce this, they were asked to enforce the resolutions they implemented and said no. That is the point at which the U.N. was becoming irrelevant and that is another argument.


The occupation of Palestein is a factual argument up for debate since the real Palestein was Jordan I believe and that Jews were also called Palestinians. In this context there was no occupation and the right of return means the end of Israel simply by numbers alone. There is no way Israel is giving up its country, end of story, so suicide killers are just that, killers.


I've also known several Iraqi's that were chearing on the U.S.

Your Iraqi's vs mine LOL


I have to flat out say your crazy to think that all countries should have Nukes, you really think Saddam should have had a Nuke. You really think a guy that gassed the Kurds in the way he did should have a Nuke, mass graves, rape rooms and torcher. Those are talking points but they are also facts. You think Mugabi should have a Nuke. That really isn't a sane comment.

Where did I say that in this thread??? What's priceless is you not understanding the thread and my response to it. :1orglaugh

Domestic blindness at it's best was my point in this thread. HELLO???? :321GFY

There are many reasons why we invaded Iraq. And it had nothing to do with the damn French. They ran away, if you remember correctly.

And I will say that oil is one of the reasons. We do not want that resource in the hands of a madman. We would rather it be in the hands of the Iraqi people so they can use their resources to better their lives and help the world.

And BTW we do not care who they sale it too, they will probably sell it to the French again even though they didn't do shit to save them. Money is money!!

Common Roger,

Bush doesn't believe God gave him permission. Knock it off. He probably believes he is doing right in a moral sense.

I can picture him walking around with George Burns in Oh God, You Devil.

Good point. This war looks way beyond Iraq, Iraq is a small part of a very complex and much larger war.

This will not deter me from dating this hot French chick I met yesterday. Call me a traitor if you want.

I will do my patriotic duty and pull her hair and hit it really hard from behind as punishment for her fellow frogs.

So?
If the UN is irrelevant, then why does Bush keep begging them for help and asking them to get involved in Iraq? Shut them down and create a new organisation that will follow rules set by the US. And we'll see what happens when US allies don't follow the rules :)

Quote:

The occupation of Palestein is a factual argument up for debate since the real Palestein was Jordan I believe and that Jews were also called Palestinians. In this context there was no occupation and the right of return means the end of Israel simply by numbers alone. There is no way Israel is giving up its country, end of story, so suicide killers are just that, killers.

No they just came and occupied a country that's not theirs.

Quote:

I have to flat out say your crazy to think that all countries should have Nukes, you really think Saddam should have had a Nuke. You really think a guy that gassed the Kurds in the way he did should have a Nuke, mass graves, rape rooms and torcher. Those are talking points but they are also facts. You think Mugabi should have a Nuke. That really isn't a sane comment.

Look at Pakistan and India. They stopped fighting the moment they got those nukes.
No, Saddam is a special case. He refused to use his nukes in the face of a certain invasion, maybe he should be up for a nobel prize :)

Loryn, call me 818-360-4352

Oh really? Here's what he said during a meeting with Abbas.

Yes, maybe he can share with Yassar Arafat ;)

The fact is that I can't remember any information on India and Pakistan using chemical weapons on their people and they have been on the brink of Nuclear Annhilation on several occasions. They continue to have the bloodshed in Kashmir but with the new talks happening at least there is some hope of resolving the confilct. However, its not as if you can fuckup with Nuclear war like you can with conventional wars. One fuckup and everyone is up shit creek without a paddle.

I will have to agree to disagree about how the Israeli situation began but the fact remains that Israel is staying so the Palestinians are going to have to give up the Suicide Killing of Innocent people if they want Peace, no right of return. End of story.

Apollo flew his chariot across the sky everyday.

Do you think that the greeks actually believed some guy Apollo flew a fiery chariot through the sky everyday. Or do you think that maybe that was how they explained the movement of the sun?

Do you think Bush and 50% or more of the population speaks in a language taught to them and passed down through religion?

"Like God talked to me and told me to yadahdada" Interpreted means I thought about this long and hard and searched my inner deepest conscience which led me to make this decision based on my purest deepest thoughts. The same process people like myself who are not religious go through described in a different manner. Not to mention, when in Rome ......

People tend to be more forgiving of mistakes when they realise what's at stake.

Try to tell them that. What are you gonna tell them? "Sure if it wasn't for Arafat's plan to use terror as a tool you'd still be in exile from your lands. Sure Israelis used terror on the British in order to get there country. Sure Tibetants have opted for peacefull resistance, so far they got nothing from it and nobody cares but please try to be more like them." ? :)

As I have said many, many times............


back to freedom fires!

Oh yeah sure, of course that's what he meant :)
Did you even hear his State of the Union speech?

the french were building reactors for iraq back in the 80's (possibly earlier). there was this whole show on the discovery channel about this some while ago. didnt surprise me much.....

the truth is the french loaned them money. along with the germans and russians.

in exchange for oil contracts


so thats why they opposed the war. its a known fact

u can't trust those pussy frenchies!