Triple 6

I have two orders of business regarding GFY. For the sake of review, if GFY continues to overthrow democratic political systems, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets. For your information, some prurient reprobates actually think that GFY never engages in nit-picky, saturnine, or pea-brained politics. This is the kind of muddled thinking that GFY is encouraging with its shenanigans. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as macabre libertines. Having said that, let me add that we must think outside the box. Only then can a society free of its meretricious, feeble-minded tracts blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that it recently stated that the sky is falling. It said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. It said it as if it meant it. That's scary, because if we are powerless to shatter the illusion that it's okay for it to indulge its every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole, it is because we have allowed GFY to replace law and order with anarchy and despotism. Other than that, GFY's headlong belief systems can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having an organization consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance. GFY backstabs its apostles, but I won't linger on that.

This is particularly interesting when you consider that GFY's spin doctors often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear. My purpose here is not to prescribe a course of action. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that GFY does not merely incite an atmosphere of violence and endangerment toward the good men, women, and children of this state. It does so consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. Given GFY's propensity for repression in the service of paradigmatic integrity, it is little wonder that GFY has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that when I first became aware of its covert invasion into our thought processes, all I could think was how it says that colonialism and militarism are identical concepts. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie. As everyone who has access to reliable information knows, GFY's campaigns are designed to create an intimidating, hostile, or demeaning environment. And they're working; they're having the desired effect.

Don't let GFY delude you into thinking that the purpose of life is self-gratification. It's just trying to reward mediocrity. Humorless nihilism enthusiasts may possess a mass of "knowledge", but their brains are unable to organize and register the material they have taken in. You see, GFY intends to create a new social class. Mendacious, bitter pip-squeaks, neurotic Machiavellians, and coldhearted smut peddlers will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their comrades. All of this once again proves the old saying that GFY's musings are a relic of an asinine past.


----- Lastly, if you think I actually wrote all that crap above, I didnt. The post is a joke. Compliments of a complaint generator I found http://hugin.sigusr1.org/~pakin/complaint

__________________
SIG TOO SMALL! Maximum 1200x600 button and no more than 30 text lines of ALL SIZES and COLORS. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 6240x4800 instead of a 1024x800.

Evil Chris

So what are you saying?

__________________

Sly_RJ

I can't believe you wrote all that. Loser!

__________________
PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144

Sly_RJ

__________________
PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144

quiet

The major problem confronting the people of the United States and free peoples everywhere in the last half of the 20th century is the threat to peace and freedom presented by the militant aggressiveness of international GFY. A major weakness in this struggle is lack of adequate imderstanding of the character of the challenge which GFY presents.

I am convinced that we are on the right side in this struggle and that we are well ahead now in its major aspects. But if we are to maintain our advantage and assure victory in the struggle, we must develop, not only among the leaders, but among the people of the free world a better understanding of the threat which confronts us.

The question is not one of being for or against GFY. The time is long past when any significant number of Americans contend that GFY is no particular concern of theirs. Few can still believe that GFY is simply a curious and twisted philosophy which happens to appeal to a certain number of zealots but which constitutes no serious threat to the interests or ideals of free society.

KRL

Don't worry with George & Dick running things it'll be OK.

http://www.haywired.com/bushwhack

__________________
If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains

DarkJedi

can someone summarize his post ?

michaelw

do u ever write normal sized posts?

__________________
<b><a href="http://www.hotlinkprotector.com"><font color="yellow">Hotlink Protector</font></a> - Protect all your file types from hotlinking the professional way. <br>
See a demo <a href="http://www.hotlinkprotector.com/demo.html"><font color="yellow">here</font></a>, and testimonials <a href="http://www.hotlinkprotector.com/testimonials.html"><font color="yellow">here</font></a><br>ICQ: 146423631

Evil Chris

GFY is being substituted for another word.

I think quiet's is "terrorism"...

__________________

quiet

quiet

close. 'communism' speech by Nixon...

Triple 6

Whats with you people requesting summaries. Have you never heard of skimming? Sounds like the type of people that are afraid to pick up a newspaper..

__________________
SIG TOO SMALL! Maximum 1200x600 button and no more than 30 text lines of ALL SIZES and COLORS. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 6240x4800 instead of a 1024x800.

boneprone

Are you saying GFY is racist to a degree?

If so, I agree bud..

Good post!

__________________

Industry Hall Of Fame Legend Mike Jones
Bow to the Power - Still BP4L
http://gfyawards.com/hall-of-fame
Learn about it kids.

Lensman

http://hugin.sigusr1.org/~pakin/complaint

This site knows alot about GFY:

I have facts for those who think and arguments for those who reason. Unless you share my view that GFY makes it its job to form the association in the public's mind between any wisecracks it disagrees with and the ideas of hate and violence and illegality, there's no need for you to hear me further. Please don't misinterpret that last statement to mean that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash. That's not at all what it means. Rather, it means that I correctly predicted that GFY would oppress, segregate, and punish others. Alas, I didn't think it'd do that so effectively -- or so soon.

Although the themes in GFY's jibes are limited, GFY's few positive contributions will continue to be overshadowed by its broader message of hate. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that slatternly yobbos are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive, then there is definitely no hope for you. Rest assured, all the deals GFY makes are strictly one-way. GFY gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. At the risk of repeating myself, I must reiterate that given the amount of misinformation that GFY is circulating, I must indeed point out that I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how GFY holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden City -- sterile obstacles to progress who extirpate the things I unquestionably cherish.

If Fate desired that GFY make a correct application of what it had read about absolutism, it would have to indicate title and page number, since the immature organization would otherwise never in all its existence find the correct place. But since Fate does not do this, if GFY thinks that the majority of phlegmatic, useless hermits are heroes, if not saints, then it's sadly mistaken. GFY is debauched, crafty, sordid, parasitic, improvident, and sniffish. Need I go on? Admittedly, GFY's cajoleries are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. But that's because on the issue of mandarinism, GFY is wrong again. Sure, one can predict on empirical grounds that in a lustrum or two it will create a mass psychology of fear about an imminent terrorist threat. But GFY's recommendations have a distinctly garrulous tone. That conclusion is not based on some sort of antihumanist philosophy or on GFY-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that GFY truly believes that materialism is the key to world peace. I hope you realize that that's just a gin-swilling pipe dream from a bitter, incomprehensible pipe, and that in the real world, GFY's lies come in many forms. Some of its lies are in the form of scribblings. Others are in the form of conclusions. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion. While we do nothing, those who instill distrust and thereby create a need for its disruptive views are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we get it off our back.

When GFY says that we ought to worship insufferable pettifoggers as folk heroes, in its mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like it believes it has said something very profound. Contrary to popular belief, it seems that no one else is telling you that it would be good for the press to start paying attention to things like this. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, GFY's plans for the future symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion -- extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom. Almost without exception, we find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that this is the best of all possible worlds and that GFY is the best of all possible organizations. This belief is due to a basic confusion, which can be cleared up simply by stating that I myself like to speak of GFY as "complacent". That's a reasonable term to use, I claim, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, some people think it's a bit extreme of me to expand people's understanding of its wild, ill-bred shenanigans -- a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that I hate GFY's constant misuse of historical analogies, so to speak.

GFY's positions have no credibility. Yes, I could add that it is so delusional, I could adopt a new world-view, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that if it were up to GFY, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism. I have a New Year's resolution for GFY: It should pick up a book before it jumps to the distasteful conclusion that society is supposed to be lenient towards ignorant dolts. GFY has recently been going around claiming that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk.

The implications of disingenuous, iconoclastic snobbism may seem theoretical, but they have concrete meaning for thousands of people. As long as I live and breathe, I will strive to find the common ground that enables others to build a true community of spirit and purpose based on mutual respect and caring, right? Right. The question, therefore, must not be, "Where are the people who are willing to stand up and acknowledge that GFY is notorious for trying to emphasize the negative in our lives instead of accentuating the positive?", but rather, "Why do we put up with it?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because this is clear to every knowledgeable observer. The sooner it comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us.

I may be opening a Pandora's box by writing this, but that's just one side of the coin. The other side is that GFY is tasteless -- maybe "brutish" would be a more applicable adjective. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to GFY. We must reach out to people with the message that grumpy practitioners of larrikinism in general, and GFY in particular, intend to create a kind of psychic pain at the very root of the modern mind. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to shoo it away like the annoying bug that it is.

GFY claims that it is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. This is a very malignant and unconstructive view and moreover, is wrong in many ways. Needless to say, if GFY can't stand the heat, it should get out of the kitchen. GFY is determined to put as little thought as possible into solving the undeniable problems that our society is still facing with regard to fetishism. It is also worthy of note that GFY's success is just a flash in the pan. So what's the connection between that and GFY's catch-phrases? The connection is that it really shouldn't use mass organization as a system of integration and control. That's just plain common sense. Of course, the people who appreciate its beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) are those who eagerly root up common sense, prominently hold it out, and decry it as poison with astonishing alacrity.

It may seem difficult at first to set the stage so that my next letter will begin from a new and much higher level of influence. It is. But GFY seeks scapegoats for its own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target it can find, that is, unrestrained lummoxes. It is my fundamental belief that it strikes me as amusing that GFY complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! It does nothing but complain. The sole point of agreement between myself and pea-brained scatterbrains is that one must consider the semiotics of careerism in order to fully understand GFY's bait-and-switch tactics, and everyone with half a brain understands that.

My intention here is not just to expose some of GFY's profligate, diabolic deeds, but also to investigate GFY's perfidious, feckless principles, ideals, and objectives. It is easy to see faults in others. But it takes perseverance to take the initiative to oppose evil wherever it rears its demented head. GFY simply spouts endless fine-sounding cliches along with unintelligible, wayward dialectic. But even if we disregard all that and examine only GFY's sappy flimflams, this seems to me to be enough to show that when GFY hears anyone say that it is as mindless as the sky is blue, its answer is to discredit legitimate voices in the neocolonialism debate. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to defy it. I maintain I am not alone when I say that GFY is reluctant to resolve problems. It always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that I don't care what others say about it. It's still dastardly, piteous, and it intends to turn loons loose against us good citizens. So you see, GFY has neither honor nor integrity, nor even knows what those words mean.

Lensman

Here's the important part, the rest:

It will doubtlessly surprise some people to hear me say this, but GFY got into a snit the last time I pointed out that its expostulations are a modern-day example of a Procrustean bed. What follows is the story of how it can be so rich in the rhetoric of democracy and yet so poor in its implementation. I undoubtedly cannot emphasize enough how much I resent GFY's taradiddles. At the risk of sounding hopelessly vicious, I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why there is absolutely no evidence to support GFY's accusations. My peers think that the messages contained in GFY's doctrines are a powerful source of illumination on the behavior of cynical kooks. While this is unquestionably true, I contend we must add that some deep void within GFY makes it necessary for it to spam the Internet with unsolicited devious, misinformed e-mail. It's that simple.

Anyone who was sober for more than an hour or two during the last five years knows that all GFY cares about is money. This is not rhetoric. This is reality. There are two reasons which induce me to submit GFY's dissertations to a special examination: 1) We must steer clear of simplistic, monocausal explanations and mythic bogeymen, and 2) GFY's refusal to admit the obvious -- that its goons can't defend their histrionics -- must rank as one of the most obstinate disinformation campaigns in history. I must admit that the second point, in particular, sometimes fills me with anxious concern.

Stripping from the term "photoreconnaissance" the negative connotations it evokes, I will try to solve the problems that are important to most people. What GFY doesn't realize is that if my memory serves me correctly, its methods are much subtler now than ever before. It is more adept at hidden mind control and its techniques of social brainwash are much more appealingly streamlined and homogenized. My next point of order is that GFY's vituperations are built on lies, and they depend on make-believe for their continuation. It strikes me as amusing that GFY complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! It does nothing but complain.

I am not mistaken when I say that it would be charitable of me not to mention that GFY's dream is to rule the world, or failing that, annihilate it. Fortunately, I am not beset by a spirit of false charity, so I will instead maintain that it just keeps on saying, "We don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. We just want to bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture." Whenever GFY encounters a free-thinking individual who presents factual data that conflicts with GFY's beliefs, it doesn't know what to do. (Actually, it has no ground and no right to pour a few drops of wormwood into our general enthusiasm, but that's not important now.) I don't want to have to hear GFY's rambling streams of consciousness, but given the way things are these days, we must remember that once you understand GFY's bromides, you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the sin of silence. It is the sin of letting GFY distract people from serious analysis of the situation. I feel no shame in writing that the acid test for GFY's "kinder, gentler" new op-ed pieces should be, "Do they still send the wrong message to children?" If the answer is yes, then we can conclude that GFY has been deluding people into believing that it answers to no one. Don't let it delude you, too.

Ask yourself: Why is it that 99 times out of 100, I call this phenomenon "GFY-ism"? I bet you'll answer the same way that I did, because we both know that that fact is simply inescapable to any thinking man or woman. "Thinking" is the key word in the previous sentence. GFY makes it its job to create a kind of psychic pain at the very root of the modern mind. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that by refusing to act, by refusing to act as a positive role model for younger people, we are giving it the power to make it impossible to disturb its dangerous gravy train.

Individually, GFY's canards remove society's moral barriers and allow perversion to prosper. But linked together, GFY's ventures could easily destabilize society. When we nourish children with good morals and self-esteem, we are not only threading our way through a maze of competing interests; we are weaving the very pattern of our social fabric. I have absolutely no idea why GFY makes such a big fuss over nativism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved -- issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that honor means nothing to GFY. Principles mean nothing to GFY. All it cares about is how best to treat anyone who doesn't agree with it to a torrent of vitriol and vilification.

GFY would have us believe that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to manipulate everything and everybody. Yeah, right. One could truthfully say that GFY is out of control, like a runaway freight train. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that it is immature and stupid of it to destroy the values, methods, and goals of traditional humanistic study. It would be mature and intelligent, however, to protect our peace, privacy, and safety, and that's why I say that if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will unmistakably find that I must ask that its cringers stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be supported by those facts. I know they'll never do that, so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to infantilize and corrupt the general public. GFY's memoirs express themselves in thousandfold manifestations, with one of its slaves in despair and hopelessness, with another in ill will, anger, and indignation, with these foolish, morally questionable wackos in indifference, and with those in furious excesses. While GFY has a right to its opinion, given a choice of having it confuse the catastrophic power of state fascism with the repression of an authoritarian government in our minds or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day. Words cannot convey the hurt and despair that I and so many others feel for those who were personally attacked by GFY. It's a pity.

It has been said that I have come to know GFY's thralls too well not to feel the profoundest disgust for their politically incorrect communications. I, in turn, maintain that to believe that all literature which opposes sadism was forged by the worst types of salacious nutters there are is to deceive ourselves. Will someone please explain to me what it is in our lives that can possibly make someone rip off everyone and his brother? Because I certainly have no idea. GFY's claims are based on hate. Hate, interventionism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life. GFY maintains that you and I are morally inferior to savage, violent pip-squeaks. Even if this were so, GFY would still be obscene. But one must consider the semiotics of pharisaism in order to fully understand GFY's editorials. Excuse me; that's not entirely correct. What I meant to say is that GFY wants us to believe that we can solve all of our problems by giving it lots of money. We might as well toss that money down a well, because we'll never see it again. What we will see, however, is that GFY claims that it is cranky to question its machinations. I feel that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves, although I should add that by excluding any possibility of comparison, GFY can easily pass off its own hijinks as works of genius. But there's the rub; a central fault line runs through each of GFY's policies. Specifically, GFY decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that it fears, because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility.

Lensman

Finally:

Why don't more people complain when they see GFY force us to adopt rigid social roles that compromise our inner code of ethics? It's because GFY has mastered the art of tricking people with images and myths. It creates myths about what the world is like and then generates false images to match those myths. This proves to me, at least, that I myself want to keep our priorities in check. I want to do this not because I need to tack another line onto my résumé, but because it seems clear that GFY should get a life and stay out of mine. But we ought to look at the matter in a broader framework before we draw final conclusions on the subject: We see that I am certain that if I asked the next person I meet if he would want GFY to deflect attention from its unwillingness to support policies that benefit the average citizen, he would say no. Yet we all stand idly by while GFY claims that nettlesome fugitives have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us. It's easy enough to hate GFY any day of the week on general principles. But now I'll tell you about some very specific things that GFY is up to, things that ought to make a real GFY-hater out of you. First off, my current plan is to draw a picture of what we conceive of under the word "semiprofessionalized". Yes, GFY will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that it is up to, the more shocking things, things like how it wants to undermine the individualistic underpinnings of traditional jurisprudence. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but "GFY" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone empty garbage pails full of the vilest slanders and defamations on the clean garments of honorable people, I tell him or her to stop "GFY-ing".

Ironically, GFY's method (or school, or ideology -- it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of "GFY-ism". It is an arrogant and avowedly unreasonable philosophy that aims to lead people towards iniquity and sin. There's a little-known truth that isn't readily acknowledged by repressive boneheads: GFY is not a responsible citizen. Responsible citizens weaken the critical links in its nexus of subhuman imperialism. Responsible citizens honestly do not dominate the whole earth and take possession of all its riches. Okay, there's no reason for me to be worthless, so I'll leave you with this concept: The antithesis of treasonous, pathetic propagandism is moral, religious, and cultural solidarity among the people of a nation.

B Sandwich

__________________
PubicBucks - Trade your pubes for bucks!

MrPopup

This past week on the No Holds Barred radio show we caught up with GFY's #1 contender Glenn Gilberti formerly known as Disco Inferno during his WCW days and below are the highlights.

Glenn started by saying he is really enjoying his time with GFY. He enjoys the positive atmosphere and the new faces he gets to work with each Wednesday night.

Glenn is thrilled with his title push and he feels the time is right for a match with Jeff Jarrett. He said Jeff has faced everybody from D'Lo Brown to Raven and feels his time is now.

Glenn said playing the role of Disco Inferno in WCW was a lot of fun but he loves his new character in GFY because it portrays a more serious side and is a closer representattion of himself.

He loves working with the S.E.X. group and says the group has done well since Vince Russo left television. He mentioned that Russo left television so other members of the group could get more mic time.

We asked Glenn of the possibility of going to the BP4L when Russo met with the BP4L writing team last year. He said that it didnt work out due to Russo and the creative team having many different opinions on the business. He feels many in the BP4L are more concerned with keeping their jobs rather then doing them. He also stated that the passion has been taken away from the performers and the BP4L shows are written on a juvenile level. He thinks the show appeals to the 15 year old age bracket but not the older 25 and up crowd.

In sticking with writing, Glenn commented that if anyone took his idea for the invisible man character seriously then the joke was on them.

He showed a clear dislike for the Ad Man gimmick which was proposed to him during the early stages of GFY and said that it was a role meant for a southerner not a man from Brooklyn, New York.

Glenn has no problem with BP4L talents coming to GFY and getting an instant push. He feels the element of surprise is great for the business and as long as no extra money goes to the winner of matches then he doesn't see a reason for anyone to be envious. He noted that when the company is doing well and everyone is making money he is happy.

Glenn called the use of pain killers in the business the nature of the beast. He said no job is like the wrestling business and it is difficult to deal with 52 straight weeks of physical stress. He said many nights talents should not even wrestle but they know when they get into the business that their bodies are always at risk. He pointed out that the change of style and crazy moves talents do these days attribute to many more injuries but also feels that today's fan craves more violence and matches therefore need high spots to keep fans interested.

He said unfortunately, with prescription pain killers comes addiction. Talents know the show must go on so many times they do what they have to do to compete on a given night. He added that it's never good to see anyone have trouble with drug abuse but it's hard for people to understand the situation if they are not working in the business full time and dealing with the pain many of these performers endure.

__________________
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1" bgcolor="#008000"><tr><td><font size=3>Gone</font></td></tr></table>

CDSmith

I wrote a piece about an asshole here recently. For the sake of politeness I have referred to him as "mr Ass Hole", but does he really deserve such respect or politeness?

You be the judge....


I am writing this letter because I recently heard some troubling news. Apparently, a large number of people actually believe Mr. Ass a. Hole's claim that he has the mandate of Heaven to destroy the values, methods, and goals of traditional humanistic study. Read on, gentle reader, and hear what I have to say. He appears to have found a new tool to use to help him force us to adopt rigid social roles that compromise our inner code of ethics. That tool is snobbism, and if you watch him wield it, you'll indubitably see why we can never return to the past. And if we are ever to move forward to the future, we have to eschew petulant negativism. I have seen and heard enough. Now, it is time to give our propaganda fighters an instrument that is very much needed at this time. I feel no more personal hatred for Mr. Hole than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them. He likes to prevent people from thinking and visualizing beyond an increasingly psychologically caged existence. Such activity can flourish only in the dark, however. If you drag it into the open, Mr. Hole and his mercenaries will run for cover, like cockroaches in a dirty kitchen when the light is turned on suddenly during the night. That's why we must appeal not to the contented and satisfied, but embrace those tormented by suffering, those without peace, the unhappy and the discontented.

If he bites me, I will really bite back. There are two main flaws with Mr. Hole's announcements: 1) the fabric of Mr. Hole's commentaries is infused with uppity mandarinism, and 2) Mr. Hole possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, he can't even spell or define "erudition," much less achieve it. This is equivalent to saying that I have to laugh when he says that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible. Where in the world did he get that idea? Not only does that idea contain absolutely no substance whatsoever, but we must learn to celebrate our diversity, not because it is the politically correct thing to do, but because I oppose Mr. Hole's ideals because they are clueless. I oppose them because they are venal. And I oppose them because they will produce a new generation of counter-productive, dotty astrologers whose opinions and prejudices, far from being enlightened and challenged, are simply legitimized before you know it.

It would be nice to say that obscene barbarism doesn't exist anymore, but we all know that it does. Do you really think Mr. Hole will ever learn from his mistakes? The essential point, however, is the following: He is the picture of the insane person on the street, babbling to a tree, a wall, or a cloud, which cannot and does not respond to his prevarications. Now that this letter has come to an end, I decidedly hope you walk away from it realizing that foul-mouthed expedients have peremptory consequences.

__________________
Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!
Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634

Rochard

Canadians scare me.

__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

Triple 6

LOL, did you read the last paragraph in my first post? Not the one where *I* said it was a joke,

Heres a snip..

__________________
SIG TOO SMALL! Maximum 1200x600 button and no more than 30 text lines of ALL SIZES and COLORS. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 6240x4800 instead of a 1024x800.

Theo

My complaint about Mr. Notorious BIG, Jr.

It is not likely that I shall say anything new here. If I do, it will be of only minor significance. Nevertheless, Mr. Notorious BIG, Jr. could use a heavy dose of sensitivity training. To get right down to it, Notorious's hastily mounted campaigns are designed to reap a harvest of death. And they're working; they're having the desired effect. If the people generally are relying on false information sown by officious personæ non gratæ, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. Guess what? Notorious's perceptions of a vast conspiracy lead him to inappropriate assessments of even the most innocent interactions with indecent nabobs of barbarism. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation.

Everybody knows that Notorious engages in pietistic babble that nauseates even some of my more religious friends, but you should consider that Notorious not only lies, but he brags about his lying to his henchmen. His objectives are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. And they promote the mistaken idea that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. Isn't it historically demonstrated that it would be a strategic blunder of epic proportions for Notorious to use organized violence to suppress opposition? I ask, because it strikes me as amusing that he complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! Notorious does nothing but complain.

All of his modes of thought share elements of traditional, grotty conspiracy themes in which savage vandals secretly regulate mercantalism. To a lesser degree and on a smaller scale, it will not be easy to give him condign punishment. Nevertheless, we must attempt to do exactly that, for the overriding reason that most of you reading this letter have your hearts in the right place. Now follow your hearts with actions. An old joke tells of the optimist who falls off a 60-story building and, as he whizzes past the 35th floor, exclaims, "So far, so good!" But it is not such blind optimism that causes Notorious's collaborators to think that they can provide financial support to backwards banana republics and their unpleasant dictators.

The hour is late indeed. Fortunately, it's not yet too late to fight for what is right. This is a transparent attempt to enact new laws forcing anyone who's not one of Notorious's cringers to live in an environment that can, at best, be described as contemptuously tolerant. He will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact, because if he didn't, you might come to realize that in order to solve the big problems with him, we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must oppose him and all he stands for.

If Notorious wants to be taken seriously, he should counter the arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal anecdotes, or insults. As I noted at the beginning of this letter, I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of his hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now. It's really not bloody-mindedness that compels me to detail the specific steps and objectives needed to thwart Notorious's crafty schemes. It's my sense of responsibility to you, the reader.

On a completely different tack, what we're involved in with Notorious is not a game. It's the most serious possible business, and every serious person -- every person with any shred of a sense of responsibility -- must concern himself with it. Speaking of which, if I didn't think he would break down the industrial-technological system, I wouldn't say that if he continues to provide cover for a crapulous agenda, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets. Someone needs to eschew shameless boosterism. Who's going to do it? Notorious? I think not.

He keeps saying that the majority of logorrheic practitioners of exhibitionism are heroes, if not saints. For some reason, Notorious's minions actually believe this nonsense. Here's an eye-opener for you: He has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that he is the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, "Because I said so." Take this example: Let's say that self-righteous common blood-stained criminals simply pass through this world sowing the seeds of evil. Now let's say that he turns his back on those who have been the most loyal to him. Does that mean that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming? No, because "Notorious" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone withhold information and disseminate half truths and whole lies, I tell him or her to stop "Notorious-ing".

While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements, his cronies are too lazy to establish democracy and equality. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that if you don't think that Notorious neglects the impact that selfishness has on the soul, then you've missed the whole point of this letter. This is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about his virulent behavior, but about the way that I find that I am embarrassed. Embarrassed that some people just don't realize that he can get away with lies (e.g., that if he kicks us in the teeth, we'll then lick his toes and beg for another kick), because the average person cannot imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will actually check out the facts for himself and discover that Notorious is lying. Notorious is addicted to the feeling of power, to the idea of controlling people. Sadly, he has no real concern for the welfare or the destiny of the people he desires to lead. Let me carry my thoughts on this subject a bit further. If he can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Disaffected Rhetoric. In the meantime, my goal is to shape a world of dignity and harmony, a world of justice, solidarity, liberty, and prosperity. I might not be successful at achieving that goal, but I doubtlessly do have to try.

Notorious is out to "solve" all our problems by talking them to death. And when we play his game, we become accomplices. Think about that for a moment. As our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the kinds of people Notorious preys upon. He should pay for his mistakes. And while we're on the subject, he wants to place stumbling blocks in front of those of us who seek value and fulfilment in our personal and professional lives. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis.

As I often like to put it, I want to deal with the relevant facts. But first, let me pose an abstract question. In view of Notorious's vengeful exegeses, what does it make sense for us to do now? People often ask me that question. It's a difficult question to answer, however, because the querist generally wants a simple, concise answer. He doesn't want to hear a long, drawn-out explanation about how I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like Notorious blow the whole situation way out of proportion. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. If the country were overrun by ill-bred fault-finders, we could expect to observe widespread discrimination in our daily lives -- stares from sales clerks, taxis that don't stop, and unwarranted license and registration checks by police. That's the sort of statement that some people think is chauvinistic, but which I believe is merely a statement of fact. And it's a statement that needs to be made, because he claims that the sun rises just for him. I respond that he does not play nice with others. I challenge you to ponder this subject with the broadest vision possible.

d0se

I can't read all that.