GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Americans Sick Of Illegals! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1134558)

Sly 02-27-2014 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by klinton (Post 19998159)
now this is CLASSIC:1orglaugh

True, it is a classic piece of history.

Smallpox was bad news. Now, one could make the argument that white man purposely gave natives smallpox, and that could be considered murder/slaughter/genocide. How to get those numbers? No clue. I suppose we could pull them out of our ass. I mean, we've already seen so much of that in this thread, let's throw in another chunk of dookie.

L-Pink 02-27-2014 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19998151)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

apparently *Americans* were so zealous in killing INdians we ventured all the way down to the Southern tip of SOuth America to get em!

And a hundred million of them too. lol

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 02-27-2014 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 19998018)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Where do people dig this shit up? 100 million Indians? What a stupid statement, that's more than the entire population of North America at the time, whites included. Our current population is only 300 million.


.

The 100 million figure most likely came from History Professor David Stannard, in his book, "American Holocaust" (1992):

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...SH20_OU01_.jpg

Quote:

For four hundred years--from the first Spanish assaults against the Arawak people of Hispaniola in the 1490s to the U.S. Army's massacre of Sioux Indians at Wounded Knee in the 1890s--the indigenous inhabitants of North and South America endured an unending firestorm of violence.

During that time the native population of the Western Hemisphere declined by as many as 100 million people. Indeed, as historian David E. Stannard argues in this stunning new book, the European and white American destruction of the native peoples of the Americas was the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world.

Stannard begins with a portrait of the enormous richness and diversity of life in the Americas prior to Columbus's fateful voyage in 1492. He then follows the path of genocide from the Indies to Mexico and Central and South America, then north to Florida, Virginia, and New England, and finally out across the Great Plains and Southwest to California and the North Pacific Coast.

Stannard reveals that wherever Europeans or white Americans went, the native people were caught between imported plagues and barbarous atrocities, typically resulting in the annihilation of 95 percent of their populations.

What kind of people, he asks, do such horrendous things to others? His highly provocative answer: Christians. Digging deeply into ancient European and Christian attitudes toward sex, race, and war, he finds the cultural ground well prepared by the end of the Middle Ages for the centuries-long genocide campaign that Europeans and their descendants launched--and in places continue to wage--against the New World's original inhabitants.

Advancing a thesis that is sure to create much controversy, Stannard contends that the perpetrators of the American Holocaust drew on the same ideological wellspring as did the later architects of the Nazi Holocaust. It is an ideology that remains dangerously alive today, he adds, and one that in recent years has surfaced in American justifications for large-scale military intervention in Southeast Asia and the Middle East.

At once sweeping in scope and meticulously detailed, American Holocaust is a work of impassioned scholarship that is certain to ignite intense historical and moral debate.


Elsewhere you mocked the idea that "the white man intentionally inflicted Indians with diseases such as small pox in order to wipe them out?"

People can scholarly discuss and dispute the numbers, however is it well-documented and indisputable that the U.S. Army committed outrageous atrocities against various Indian tribes, and that a number of these atrocities were explicitly genocidal in intent.

http://www.famousquotesabout.com/quo...ood-Indian.jpg

http://www.onjinjinkta.com/NP/assets...0any%20man.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-V93f9fujjY...nd%2Bsale2.jpg

Quote:

Letters exist between two British officers, General Jeffrey Amherst (later Lord Amherst) and Colonel Henry Bouquet, that explicitly advocate the idea of using smallpox-infested blankets to kill Indians at the Siege of Fort Pitt.

Bouquet suggests the distribution of blankets to "inocculate the Indians." Amherst approves this plan and suggests "to try Every other method that can serve to Extirpate this Execrable Race." Also cited by this source is an entry in the Journal of William Trent, who was the local militia commander: "we gave them two Blankets and an Handkerchief out of the Small Pox Hospital. I hope it will have the desired effect."
Quote:

Bouquet discussed the matter in a postscript to a letter to Amherst on July 13, 1763:

P.S. I will try to inocculate the Indians by means of Blankets that may fall in their hands, taking care however not to get the disease myself. As it is pity to oppose good men against them, I wish we could make use of the Spaniard's Method, and hunt them with English Dogs. Supported by Rangers, and some Light Horse, who would I think effectively extirpate or remove that Vermine.
Quote:

On July 16 Amherst replied, also in a postscript:

P.S. You will Do well to try to Innoculate the Indians by means of Blanketts, as well as to try Every other method that can serve to Extirpate this Execrable Race. I should be very glad your Scheme for Hunting them Down by Dogs could take Effect, but England is at too great a Distance to think of that at present.

On July 26 Bouquet wrote back:

I received yesterday your Excellency's letters of 16th with their Inclosures. The signal for Indian Messengers, and all your directions will be observed.
https://realrest.files.wordpress.com...97049795_o.jpg

:stoned

ADG

HerPimp 02-27-2014 01:43 PM

Fear China not the Mexicans

Romainz 02-27-2014 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HerPimp (Post 19998226)
Fear China not the Mexicans

lol :1orglaugh

Rochard 02-27-2014 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19998145)
Let's take a fair middle ground on these numbers and say 5million.

estimates show well over 90% of them were wiped out with disease, let's choose a low estimate, say 92%.

8% of 5m leaves 400,000. and let's assume that 230,00 remaining Indians in 1910

= 170,000 killed by Europeans and their descendants, of which the US Army killed ~20,000.

So we went from hundreds of millions to twenty thousand. Big difference.

dyna mo 02-27-2014 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 19998193)
Elsewhere you mocked the idea that "the white man intentionally inflicted Indians with diseases such as small pox in order to wipe them out?"

I'm the one that mocked that.

Small pox can only be transmitted person to person. A couple of military can send letters back and forth about blankets, but that doesn't = a widespread effort and especially doesn't mean anything came from it since blankets can't transfer the disease.

deltav 02-27-2014 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19998273)
I'm the one that mocked that.

Small pox can only be transmitted person to person. A couple of military can send letters back and forth about blankets, but that doesn't = a widespread effort and especially doesn't mean anything came from it since blankets can't transfer the disease.

This isn't correct. From the NIH's own website entry on smallpox: "Contaminated clothing or bed linens also can spread the virus. Those caring for people with smallpox need to use special safety measures to ensure that all bedding and clothing from the infected person are cleaned appropriately with bleach and hot water. Caretakers can use disinfectants such as bleach and ammonia to clean contaminated surfaces."

But it's true there aren't too many documents indicating anything like intentional biological warfare - just a few. Again, I think we're running into a semantics issue where you're citing deaths as a direct result of violence and others are totaling them as a direct result of European expansion (including violence, disease brought by Euros, famine due to eradicated food sources and loss of land, etc).

Either way, lotta people died, same as everywhere else.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 02-27-2014 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19998273)

I'm the one that mocked that.

Small pox can only be transmitted person to person. A couple of military can send letters back and forth about blankets, but that doesn't = a widespread effort and especially doesn't mean anything came from it since blankets can't transfer the disease.

More Dyna Mo disinformation... :1orglaugh

From the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases:

Quote:

Transmission

Smallpox is highly contagious. In most cases, people get smallpox by inhaling droplets of saliva, which are full of virus, during face-to-face contact with an infected person. When someone becomes infected, they do not immediately feel sick or shed virus to their household contacts. In addition, they have no symptoms for 10 to 12 days. After the virus has multiplied and spread throughout the body, a rash and fever develop. This is the "illness" portion of the disease, and it's when someone is most infectious.

Some risk of transmission lasts, however, until all scabs have fallen off. Contaminated clothing or bed linens also can spread the virus. Those caring for people with smallpox need to use special safety measures to ensure that all bedding and clothing from the infected person are cleaned appropriately with bleach and hot water. Caretakers can use disinfectants such as bleach and ammonia to clean contaminated surfaces.
http://www.niaid.nih.gov/topics/smal...nsmission.aspx

Quote:

Transmission occurs through inhalation of airborne variola virus, usually droplets expressed from the oral, nasal, or pharyngeal mucosa of an infected person. It is transmitted from one person to another primarily through prolonged face-to-face contact with an infected person, usually within a distance of 6 feet (1.8 m), but can also be spread through direct contact with infected bodily fluids or contaminated objects (fomites) such as bedding or clothing.
Getting back on topic, I am appalled at the ignorance and hatred displayed in the video that started this thread. Not sure how much good can come from such attitudes. :2 cents:

http://sociorocketnewsen.files.wordp...2/03/10011.jpg

As I indicated earlier, American white racists are going to be in for a rude awakening as the demographics rapidly change over the next 10-20 years. If they are not very happy with minorities now, wait until the tables are turned on them. :helpme

:stoned

ADG

_Richard_ 02-27-2014 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evy97 (Post 19998093)
What are you talking about? North American Indian population went from an 15 million in 1500 to barely 230 000 in 1910.




Sorry to disappoint you. But..

http://i.imgur.com/QCsSoKf.png

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

dyna mo 02-27-2014 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 19998340)
More Dyna Mo disinformation... :1orglaugh



I have the nutsack to share my views directly via my own words and you seem to have an issue with that, thus your need to describe my views as "disinformation" attempting to discredit me by suggesting I am intentionally trying to spread falsehoods. Yet as I've mentioned, I'm more than open to facts and figures. And if I'm wrong, I've acknoweldged that many times here at gfy. Sadly, I've never once seen you be able to do that.

dyna mo 02-27-2014 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deltav (Post 19998339)
This isn't correct. From the NIH's own website entry on smallpox: "Contaminated clothing or bed linens also can spread the virus. Those caring for people with smallpox need to use special safety measures to ensure that all bedding and clothing from the infected person are cleaned appropriately with bleach and hot water. Caretakers can use disinfectants such as bleach and ammonia to clean contaminated surfaces."

But it's true there aren't too many documents indicating anything like intentional biological warfare - just a few. Again, I think we're running into a semantics issue where you're citing deaths as a direct result of violence and others are totaling them as a direct result of European expansion (including violence, disease brought by Euros, famine due to eradicated food sources and loss of land, etc).

Either way, lotta people died, same as everywhere else.

Thanks for the update, I was going on recollection. Nevertheless, the point is still valid, a correspondence between 2 military figures 300+ years into the time that disease had wiped out Indians is no real proof that the Army had a strategy to use small pox to not only wipe out the Indians, but actually wiped out any significant # of them, the majority of them had already succombed to the disease.

dyna mo 02-27-2014 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deltav (Post 19998339)

But it's true there aren't too many documents indicating anything like intentional biological warfare - just a few. Again, I think we're running into a semantics issue where you're citing deaths as a direct result of violence and others are totaling them as a direct result of European expansion (including violence, disease brought by Euros, famine due to eradicated food sources and loss of land, etc).

Either way, lotta people died, same as everywhere else.

This seems like an accurate description.

mineistaken 02-27-2014 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RyuLion (Post 19998048)
Wow, talk about pissed off and racist people..

Anti illegal, not anti race. People like to drop racism everywhere where white people say something.

crockett 02-27-2014 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HerPimp (Post 19998226)
Fear China not the Mexicans

The Chinese can't swim that far silly..

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 02-27-2014 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19998356)

I have the nutsack to share my views directly via my own words and you seem to have an issue with that, thus your need to describe my views as "disinformation" attempting to discredit me by suggesting I am intentionally trying to spread falsehoods. Yet as I've mentioned, I'm more than open to facts and figures. And if I'm wrong, I've acknoweldged that many times here at gfy. Sadly, I've never once seen you be able to do that.

It doesn't take a nutsack to spread disinformation, and the fact is that you repeatedly spread falsehoods, I just rarely call you out on them (I'm even more generous to Robbie, whose anecdotes and libertarian bombastic bluster is mind-boggling at times, lol).

I showed where the 100 million figure probably came from, even though I wasn't the one who posted the image that provoked the controversy (this time), and I also question the numbers that Stannard came up with (however I do not deny that there was massive abuse and mistreatment of Native Americans by the European settlers, and later the US government, that totally fits the definition of genocide).

I'm curious, where did you get the idea that smallpox was impossible to transmit via blankets, since you stated it unequivocally more than once?

You said if you were wrong you admit it, but if you want to split hairs, your point on smallpox was not "still valid" (as you postulated), since your premise was that it was impossible for Small Pox to spread through blankets.

One more example of how you mislead people, is that you have suggested that I never correct myself when I am in error on GFY. Indeed I have. You even posted before and after me in this same thread:

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 19872790)

Woops, my bad...had the wrong show (although probably a good thing for AVN, lol). :helpme

BTW, I just noticed that I misspelled "Whoops" in that post too...I guess I can pull a Dyna Mo Hmmm, and say that I was still correct, since Whoops is phoneticized as Woops: :winkwink:

Quote:

whoops
wo͞ops,wo͝ops/
exclamation informal
1.
another term for oops.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pk9_H1U3qe...-excuse-me.jpg

:stoned

ADG

pimpmaster9000 02-27-2014 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19998013)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I think the saddest part of the internet are the people who believe memes.

Actual # is closer to about 25,000 max killed by EUROPEANS and their descendants.

it was max 25 total...and 19 of them died from exploding backpacks at airports :2 cents: also you make such a strong point with EUROPEANS killed the 25 terrorist native americans...this completely washes all responsibility form your founding fathers who all had legal visas drawn in the native american embassy in europe...

it was a tourist thing IMO "Come loot and pillage in the Americas! All you can steal for 99cents!"

may I congratulate you on the stupidity of your "EUROPEANS did it"?

ah american history LOL not a single fucking proud moment...

"americans sick of illegals" what advanced sarcasm LOL man the north korea in you guys is sooooo strong :1orglaugh ok no carry on pretending you have the right to moan about illegals LOL its very amusing

dyna mo 02-27-2014 03:59 PM

ADG, what is it you want from me? I already mentioned to Deltav, I stand corrected on the small pox. If you want me to recollect exactly where I recollect that, that's not possible, I'm too old to pinpoint it. You want me to tell you you're always right? ALways agree with you? Not post my views that may not jibe with your's?

Apologize for something?

Fill me in, I'm open. I've settled my differences with several people on this board and get along with them fine these days and still post my views and they do as well, perhaps you're open to that as well.

pimpmaster9000 02-27-2014 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 19997636)
Legally.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:

dyna mo 02-27-2014 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 19998417)
it was max 25 total...and 19 of them died from exploding backpacks at airports :2 cents: also you make such a strong point with EUROPEANS killed the 25 terrorist native americans...this completely washes all responsibility form your founding fathers who all had legal visas drawn in the native american embassy in europe...

it was a tourist thing IMO "Come loot and pillage in the Americas! All you can steal for 99cents!"

may I congratulate you on the stupidity of your "EUROPEANS did it"?

ah american history LOL not a single fucking proud moment...

"americans sick of illegals" what advanced sarcasm LOL man the north korea in you guys is sooooo strong :1orglaugh ok no carry on pretending you have the right to moan about illegals LOL its very amusing

You do realize the FOunding Fathers era was ~1770s right? A full 300 years into this. I also stated Europeans and their descendants, which is accurate/



.

dyna mo 02-27-2014 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 19998417)
it was max 25 total...and 19 of them died from exploding backpacks at airports :2 cents: also you make such a strong point with EUROPEANS killed the 25 terrorist native americans...this completely washes all responsibility form your founding fathers who all had legal visas drawn in the native american embassy in europe...

it was a tourist thing IMO "Come loot and pillage in the Americas! All you can steal for 99cents!"

may I congratulate you on the stupidity of your "EUROPEANS did it"?

ah american history LOL not a single fucking proud moment...

"americans sick of illegals" what advanced sarcasm LOL man the north korea in you guys is sooooo strong :1orglaugh ok no carry on pretending you have the right to moan about illegals LOL its very amusing


Are you not aware of the spanish colonization of America which began in the 1400s?

dyna mo 02-27-2014 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 19998417)
"americans sick of illegals" what advanced sarcasm LOL man the north korea in you guys is sooooo strong :1orglaugh ok no carry on pretending you have the right to moan about illegals LOL its very amusing

When did I say I was sick of illegals? or moan about them?

deltav 02-27-2014 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 19998417)
it was max 25 total...and 19 of them died from exploding backpacks at airports :2 cents: also you make such a strong point with EUROPEANS killed the 25 terrorist native americans...this completely washes all responsibility form your founding fathers who all had legal visas drawn in the native american embassy in europe...

it was a tourist thing IMO "Come loot and pillage in the Americas! All you can steal for 99cents!"

may I congratulate you on the stupidity of your "EUROPEANS did it"?

ah american history LOL not a single fucking proud moment...

"americans sick of illegals" what advanced sarcasm LOL man the north korea in you guys is sooooo strong :1orglaugh ok no carry on pretending you have the right to moan about illegals LOL its very amusing

Cocaine is a helluva drug...

pimpmaster9000 02-27-2014 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deltav (Post 19998433)
Cocaine is a helluva drug...

denial is so amusing to watch...carry on...

pimpmaster9000 02-27-2014 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19998425)
Are you not aware of the spanish colonization of America which began in the 1400s?

and those same spaniards are illegals now in "your" country even though they got visas (LOL) earlier :1orglaugh

dyna mo 02-27-2014 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 19998455)
and those same spaniards are illegals now in "your" country even though they got visas (LOL) earlier :1orglaugh

I couldn't care less. And I live in socal! Home to many (most?) illegals.

Sly 02-27-2014 04:49 PM

Where is CyberSEO when we need him?

CourtneyR 02-27-2014 04:58 PM

its really a shame how ignorant some people can be. All our or families immigrated to the US at one point from elsewhere (besides the native Americans who we killed and stole land from). I don't see how other can push that fact out of their mind just to beat there cheats and say GTFO.

Grapesoda 02-27-2014 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 19998172)
True, it is a classic piece of history.

Smallpox was bad news. Now, one could make the argument that white man purposely gave natives smallpox, and that could be considered murder/slaughter/genocide. How to get those numbers? No clue. I suppose we could pull them out of our ass. I mean, we've already seen so much of that in this thread, let's throw in another chunk of dookie.

actually an America carvery officer did in fact give smallpox infected blankets to the Indians.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Fort_Pitt

On June 29, 1763, a week after the siege began, Bouquet was preparing to lead an expedition to relieve Fort Pitt when he received a letter from Amherst making the following proposal: "Could it not be contrived to Send the Small Pox among those Disaffected Tribes of Indians? We must, on this occasion, Use Every Stratagem in our power to Reduce them."

however germ warfare has always been very poplar since earliest times

Grapesoda 02-27-2014 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19998361)
Thanks for the update, I was going on recollection. Nevertheless, the point is still valid, a correspondence between 2 military figures 300+ years into the time that disease had wiped out Indians is no real proof that the Army had a strategy to use small pox to not only wipe out the Indians, but actually wiped out any significant # of them, the majority of them had already succombed to the disease.

On June 29, 1763, a week after the siege began, Bouquet was preparing to lead an expedition to relieve Fort Pitt when he received a letter from Amherst making the following proposal: "Could it not be contrived to Send the Small Pox among those Disaffected Tribes of Indians? We must, on this occasion, Use Every Stratagem in our power to Reduce them."[

_Richard_ 02-27-2014 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 19998520)

however germ warfare has always been very poplar since earliest times

:2 cents::2 cents:

Dvae 02-27-2014 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CourtneyR_FFN (Post 19998489)
its really a shame how ignorant some people can be. All our or families immigrated to the US at one point from elsewhere (besides the native Americans who we killed and stole land from). I don't see how other can push that fact out of their mind just to beat there cheats and say GTFO.

If you feel that strongly about the fact that we stole land from the native Americans then you better start packing. You're on stolen land. How can you sleep at night knowing that fact?

Wars are fought for land as well as other reasons, somebody wins somebody loses. Get over it!

dyna mo 02-27-2014 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 19998525)
On June 29, 1763, a week after the siege began, Bouquet was preparing to lead an expedition to relieve Fort Pitt when he received a letter from Amherst making the following proposal: "Could it not be contrived to Send the Small Pox among those Disaffected Tribes of Indians? We must, on this occasion, Use Every Stratagem in our power to Reduce them."[

Yes, ADG already pointed out that obscure communication. Again, that doesn't reflect widespread strategy to use smallpox as a weapon and also doesn't matter, there had already been ~300 years of smallpox wiping out Indians prior to that correspondence.

Dvae 02-27-2014 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19997689)
Guess that's the reason we took all that land from the Mexicans too?

What land did we take? I seem to recall a war being fought and monies being paid. Thats how it works. Somebody wins somebody loses.

dyna mo 02-27-2014 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 19998525)
On June 29, 1763, a week after the siege began, Bouquet was preparing to lead an expedition to relieve Fort Pitt when he received a letter from Amherst making the following proposal: "Could it not be contrived to Send the Small Pox among those Disaffected Tribes of Indians? We must, on this occasion, Use Every Stratagem in our power to Reduce them."[

more from the wiki page you quoted:

Quote:

the disease was already in the area and may have reached the Indians through other vectors.
Indeed, even before the blankets had been handed over, the disease may have been spread to the Indians by native warriors returning from attacks on infected white settlements.

dyna mo 02-27-2014 07:10 PM

I decided to do a bit of googling on the smallpox as a weapon thing, here's what I've found



Quote:

The now-familiar account of the infected blankets at Fort Pitt needs revision.
Logic, a better understanding of smallpox itself, and another look at the
evidence call into question much of the standard rendition of the story and
the ways that historians for more than a century have misrepresented the evidence.
Quote:

In his Ecological Imperialism Crosby devoted
an appendix to smallpox and, in a note, discussed what he called "the old
legend of intentional European bacteriological warfare." Asserting that the
colonists certainly would have liked to wage such a war and did talk about
giving infected blankets and such to the indigenes, and they may even have
done so a few times, but by and large the legend is just that, a legend. Before
the development of modern bacteriology at the end of the 1 9 'h century, diseases
did not come in ampoules, and there were no refrigerators in which to
store the ampoules.... As for infected blankets, they might or might not
work. Furthermore, and most important, the intentionally transmitted disease
might swing back on the white population.... These people were
dedicated to quarantining smallpox, not to spreading it.
Quote:

One historian, Bernhard Knollenberg, was not impressed by Peckham's
analysis of the Fort Pitt incident, which was "substantially the same as
Parkman's." Knollenberg, in an article in the Mississippi Valley Historical Review,
went over all the documentation related to smallpox at Fort Pitt and
came to a quite different conclusion than Peckham or Parkman. "It is true,"
Knollenberg announced, "that some British officers may be charged with what
Parkman called a 'detestable' intent, but execution of the intent is not supported
even by circumstantial evidence."
Quote:

The multicultural revisionism of the 1980s and 1990s seemed to reinvigorate
the old story. No one did more during those decades to spread and
extend it than Francis Jennings. In his Empire ofFortune, published in 1988,
he hinted that the British-unleashed smallpox caused "possibly more deaths"
than the fighting; the various outbreaks of smallpox that hit the natives during
the fighting of the 1750s might have been more British germ warfare. His
"suspicion" was supported by no evidence except the Fort Pitt episode of 1763.

Quote:

when Bouquet wrote to
Fort Pitt's commander, he said nothing about passing on smallpox to the Indians,
as Knollenberg pointed out. Nor did Bouquet do anything about spreading
the disease afterward. Bouquet's response to Amherst seems to have been
merely a way to deflect a bizarre idea of his superior officer. As the colonel
commented inJuly 1763, sometimes it was better "to hide what one thinks.""
In practice, Bouquet ignored Amherst's suggestion, not out of humanitarian
feelings towards the Indians, but for his own personal safety. Neither Amherst
nor Bouquet actually tried germ warfare.

Quote:

The time is long overdue for what happened at Fort Pitt in 1763 to be discussed rationally and on the basis of evidence rather than unsupported and repititious assumptions.
Alfred W. Crosby, Ecological Imperialism:
The Biological Expansion ofEurope, 900-1900
(New York, 1986), 345

Bernhard Knollenberg, "General Amherst
and Germ Warfare," Mississippi Valley Historical
Review, 41 (1954-1955), 489-494.

klinton 02-28-2014 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 19998466)
Where is CyberSEO when we need him?

looks like that he engages only in topics that talk about his motherland, Russia.

Matt 26z 02-28-2014 03:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CourtneyR_FFN (Post 19998489)
its really a shame how ignorant some people can be. All our or families immigrated to the US at one point from elsewhere

Hypothetically speaking, lets say you wanted to leave the US and move to another country.

Do you believe you have the right to immigrate to any country in the world whether you meet their requirements or not?

2MuchMark 02-28-2014 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 19997461)
For those too lazy to click... :helpme



It's going to be a rough transition for those white folks when they find themselves and their attitudes in the minority in the not too distant future. :2 cents:

:stoned

ADG

http://payload.cargocollective.com/1...25846395_l.png

JockoHomo 02-28-2014 05:09 AM

http://31.media.tumblr.com/7148b04bf...0kr9o1_400.gif


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123