.xxx

[r0bman]

Seeing as porn.xxx is being used by them to promote the sales of the xxx domain.... how would porn.com get their xxx domain?

[BJ]

I bought zappos.xxx fuck them

[Nikki_Licks]

Originally Posted by r0bman

Seeing as porn.xxx is being used by them to promote the sales of the xxx domain.... how would porn.com get their xxx domain?

Lawsuit

[Wizzo]

Why dot com, what about porn.net or porn.org? This is why the lawyers are going to have field day on .xxx....

[F-U-Jimmy]

Yep! i can see a lot of © and ® infringement lawsuits in XXX's future

[Chosen]

xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx

[Wilsy]

Originally Posted by r0bman

Seeing as porn.xxx is being used by them to promote the sales of the xxx domain.... how would porn.com get their xxx domain?

Good question Roberto and i was wondering the same myself just yesterday.. Be interesting to see how this one pans out

[r0bman]

Especially as it is being used by the officials of .xxx, to sell .xxx
Didn't they say that .com owners had rights to the .xxx version of their domain?

[2intense]

porn.com will be the same after 1 week,after 2 years etc ,porn.xxx is just a fucking funny joke

[DBS.US]

If your going to be a tool and buy a .xxx domain please use my discount code for $10 off

[Barry-xlovecam]

Assuming that porn.com is not the registrant of porn.xxx;

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/

[C H R I S]

I dont think Porn is a trademarked name -- it;s generic like bigtits.com or blowjob.com.

[Barry-xlovecam]

US Trademark search

Search 'porn.com' that image for that name is trademark ...
Search 'porn' see how may trademarks have been granted with that name included ...
Other trademarks in other nations would apply also. Post and other nation's internet search for trademarks ...

However;

"[T]hus, to succeed on its claim, the Complainant must prove that: 1) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; 2) Тhe Respondent has no "rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name"; and 3) The domain name "has been registered and is being used in bad faith. " Paragraph 4(a) of the UDRP. ..."

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/s...ase=D2011-0042

That might be a real pissing contest ...

WORDS that are not trademarked might not work in a WIPO arbitration.

So, all the SEO keyword domains are fair game unless their combinations of words are trademarked? Good question ...

[merina0803]

Originally Posted by r0bman

Seeing as porn.xxx is being used by them to promote the sales of the xxx domain.... how would porn.com get their xxx domain?

porn.xxx = 99.192.180.202 = mojo = same host as pimproll. why people think they got jacked still.

[merina0803]

Originally Posted by Nikki_Licks

Lawsuit

from who? pimproll going to sue themselves?

[Barry-xlovecam]

"[T]he Respondent has chosen to use a domain name that contains the distinctive element of the Complainant's trademark in its entirety without authorisation by the Complainant. As a consequence, the disputed domain name infers a website related to the services of the Complainant. Instead, according to the Complainant?s unrefuted allegations, the website displays sponsored links to the Complainant?s competitors which would generate revenue for the Respondent. Clearly, no rights or legitimate interests derive from this type of use of another's trademark and the Respondent is trying to benefit from the reputation of the Complainant's widely known trademark. Previous panels have held that rights and legitimate interests cannot be created where the respondent would not choose such a name unless it was seeking to create an impression of association with the complainant (see, for example, Drexel University v. David Brouda, WIPO Case No. D2001-0067).

There is no evidence before the Panel to show that the Respondent was acting in pursuance of any rights or legitimate interests when registering the disputed domain name. In addition, the Complainant has denied having any connection with the Respondent or providing any authorisation at all. In Guerlain S.A. v. Peikang, WIPO Case No. D2000-0055 the panel stated ?[i]n the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use any of its trademarks or to apply for or use any domain incorporating those trademarks, it is clear that no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could be claimed by the Respondent?.

Despite the opportunity provided through this dispute process, the Respondent has chosen not to rebut the Complainant's case or assert any rights in the disputed domain name.

Based on the above, the Panel considers the Complainant has made out a prima facie case that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. The Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has proven the second element of the Policy. ...

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/s...ase=D2011-0351

Adding a word to a famous trademark name ...

"tractorsupplycoupon.com" in the above case. So, something like www.gofuckyourselfboard.xxx might be successfully challenged