Quote:
Originally posted by UnseenWorld
Hmm, I would run this particular release past an attorney. It has a line reading "I hereby state that if I choose to engage in an sexual act while performing as a paid model, it will be for my personal enjoyment" which (apart from the typo) is a baldfaced lie on the face of it (the model is posing for money), and in some jurisdictions to accept money to perform a sexual act for the enjoyment of someone present is a sufficient definition of prostitution. It is the fact that the sex is NOT being performed for the enjoyment of anyone present that allows for the veil of First Amendment protection.
|
Reread it, it's trying to state that the model is doing it for the fun of it and not the money.
A good way around this, check it with a lawyer, is to pay the model for the rights to sell the pictures. Not for the modelling she was doing, that was free, the rights to own/resell the pictures is what she was paid for.
Unseen
I do agree with your next statement but as you have said many times there are many different styles and requirements on the net. This guy might just be a natural as the guy at Cute Teens YDG, if my memory serves me right.
There is more to read from that other "Natural" PM or something.
http://www.contentspotlight.com/centerstage.html
