In a recent thread regarding CCBill, I noticed some discussion about people who promote ccbill only. But I am aware that there are some who don't want to promote ccbill sites at all.
I am working on a new affiliate program. Currently there are two websites in our portfolio, with plans for a third very soon. Well, I say two, but one will not actually be online until next week. Those are both solo girl sites. The first one is
here, and the one coming online next week is
here.
My question to those who are potential affilaites for this (or any) program is this: Do you prefer a site that is processed using CCBill or do you prefer to avoid CCBill?
The follow up to that question is: If you like to promote CCBill sites/programs, do you prefer a site to use software like NATS/MPA3 or do you prefer to only have CCBill in the mix?
I am currently trying to decide on if I should use an affilaite backend or just use the CCBill alone. I certainly see the benefits of using a program like NATS because of the features, but I don't need them at the expense of affiliates.
I'm sure that there are folks on both sides, so really I am looking for the answer to "which side has more affiliates". Of course, that only matters if they have more/better traffic!