Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Franck
So lets see.
They fired a painted missile a few feet off the ground from a few miles away. Then when it hit the building they planted some plane pieces and then they made up a story about a 757 and 60 people missing who infact were all sitting at home watching tv.
Is that about right?
|
thtat doesnt sound so unrealistic franck , cept they didnt plant the pieces.
they made the missile appear to be a plane.
Personally , the evidence to me is so inconslusive its laughable. it doesnt really point to anything at all..
A few things need closer attention though .. like i havent seen anyone come forward to i.d. the engines in the pentagon rubble as the ngines from the aircraft it was supposed to be on. On the contrary every report i have heard suggests the gnines were from a completely different type of aircraft..
But those details are so strange/misrepresented that its unclear of what to believe and what not to believe..
Some things are alot easier to understand.. like . EVERY 7-11 in the country has better camera surveilance than the pentagon appears to have..
Where are the other videos?
Then the excuse about not releasing the video . the video is like 2 more frames of the same video we have already seen. So why exactly haven't we been alowed to see it ? Oh i forgot it might influence the jurors in that 9/11 terrorists trials .. LOL cmon now who is being naive