Quote:
Originally posted by Webby
DUH??? I wasn't even "dicussing" anything with you?? What were we supposed to be discussing??
I never actually had *any* discussion with you, only commented on some testosterone imbalance
All I see is some diatribe on your part assuming this and that about every subject under the sun.
Na.. got no interest in wasting time with an asshole on "social classes" and assumptions of "beliefs" - I got work to do!
Can't be bothered to read your shit anyway.. too boring!
|
For those of you who don't know, today, we might have let Webby replace law and order with anarchy and despotism. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will tackle the multinational death machine that Webby is currently constructing. To put this in context, he does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, Webby discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent. For all his bombast about freedom, liberty, and tolerance, he still wants to pooh-pooh the concerns of others, and I'm not making that up! His methods of interpretation are popular among confused suborners of perjury, but that doesn't mean the rest of us have to accept them. While the concept of broad-based peace and social justice coalitions remains desirable, you should not ask, "Is Webby so virulent as to think that this can go on forever?", but rather, "Why does Webby have to be such a party pooper?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because when Webby says that those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve, that's just a load of spucatum tauri.
