Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ronaldo
I have a bit of a problem with that story.
I'm not saying it didn't happen, and I'm also not a doctor, but it seems to me possible that there could be another (but still possibly disturbing) explanation.
WHAT person, in their right mind or NOT, would sexually assault a one day old IN the very hospital their child was born with all those people around??
"There were some skin tears in and around the private (back) area of the child," he said.
The investigation led to the child's parents, Nanney said, and there was no indication that any hospital worker was involved in the incident.
"Based on the investigation, we ruled out everyone but the mom and the dad," Nanney said.
I'll wait and see what exactly the investigation consisted of before I pass any personal judgement on anyone, including the parents. I think there's more to the story than what's in that article.
|
You know Ron, my first reaction was 'shoot those fuckers' but in reading the entire story, it just doesn't seem to jive.
If they noticed this the day or the day before the child was released and there was the suspicion, why release the child into their care in the first place? Just doesn't seem 'right' - if you suspect a child has been raped and the people this child has had the most contact within the last 24 hours (since birth) has been with the parents, logic would say report it, and don't release the child to the parents - unless she is breastfeeding and in which case I'd say place them both in some type of government care/hospital and under surveillance.
There is nothing that can piss me off more - but I do think they don't have the full story or they aren't looking past their noses for possibilities.
Sad story - I hope that child can grow with the least amount of problems
