Quote:
Originally posted by punkworld
In short, you say you don't agree with me (in very pompous words), you accuse me of ideas I never said I have, and accuse me of following "political fashion". However, you fail to bring up even one solid argument.
Try refuting my argumentations, instead of trying to refute me as a person. I really don't care if you like the way I talk, I care if you can provide a solid argumentation for your opinions. It seems you can not.
|
I am not afraid to call someone wrong when he does something, says something, stands for something, or engages in something that violates the values in which are considered most common in the free world. I guess I should start by saying that Punkworld just reported that society is screaming for his musings. Do you think that that's merely sloppy reporting on Punkworld's part? I don't. I think that it's a deliberate attempt to gum up what were once great ideas.
Shame on him for thinking that people like you and me are unsophisticated! He wants us to feel sorry for the rash, quixotic nymphomaniacs who intensify race hatred. I myself insist we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that Punkworld's myrmidons have learned their scripts well, and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation. I've said this before, and I'll say it again, but Punkworld has, at times, called me "peremptory" or "self-satisfied". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to tap into the national resurgence of overt absenteeism. Although he won't admit it, I frequently talk about how two wrongs don't make a right. I would drop the subject, except that I don't see how he can be so unsympathetic -- and Punkworld knows it.