|
Are these cross border regulations new? Why has this not been an issue in the past with people who happen to be cross border infringers for no other reason than a preference for a particular IPSP? For example it is extremely common practice to have a "big 3" main IPSP and a foriegn IPSP as your secondary cc option. What you are saying is that anyone who is doing that now for whatever reason must cancel his secondary processor.
Whether this is a new regulation or an existing one, I do not understand how we are supposed to stay clear of breaking the rules when we are only fed little scraps of information occasionally, how many other rules am I breaking right now simply because I do not know the rules exist?
|