View Single Post
Old 05-09-2006, 12:28 AM  
MikeHawk
Confirmed User
 
MikeHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In bed with Harley Girl....Not sleepin
Posts: 6,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by FightThisPatent
yup, they posted that up, because there were several registrars taking pre-orders, when they had no right to do so.. some had no refund policies, so ICM's message was a good one.


I believe that WHEN .XXX fails,that ICM/IFFOR continue their efforts by pushing ICANN for the .KIDS TLD.

All the principals that IFFOR created for .XXX are well suited for .KIDS (minus the part of having ONE adult directors seat).

ICM could be the registry and IFFOR can help to monitor the policies for .KIDS

People like Parry Afstab fit in perfectly, and they can still get their "grants" and funding, but this time, through the sale of .KIDS domains.

They would have spent all their money and time, that they could salvage things by pushing for .KIDS They expressed last year at the FL show that there wasn't enough interest nor money to be made with .KIDS

I think they are wrong.

I thnk that ICM could, ironically, get alot of support from the adult biz to run the .KIDS TLD.

WHEN .XXX gets knocked down by ICANN, if ICM doesn't want to step to take on the .KIDS TLD, then we'll just all lobby Network Solutions to do it.


Fight the plan 9 from outer space!

hahahaaa....

Go Brandon, good for you buddy, like your style, good stuff.....


Now what i want to know is this:

Lazy or just stupid?
Which is it that makes webmasters NOT POST against .XXX?

I was just wondering...lol



NO TO .XXX
__________________
THE AMBUSH INTERVIEW
MikeHawk is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote