GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

Webby · 10-07-2002, 10:50 PM

*The quote above is from you Webby. We have talked for 11 years with the Iraqi government, and the UN, in an effort to get Iraq to abide by the agreements made after their military forces were defeated on the field of battle. How much longer do you suggest we talk before we act?*

As long as there is no "imminent danger" you talk as long as it takes. It has still not been established that there is, in fact, any danger from Iraq. All that has been said so far, is "words", - even the US Admin had to 'cool' some of the propaganda they issued... eg.. "terrorist cells working in Iraq" when the story was just not credible. (but hell.. there may well be!!*g*) ....

If you are talking of broken promises... just take a look at the US Admin... in particular the current Admin .. they have broken so many promises and treaties ... signed many and then just filed them, never to be implimented. So, Saddam ain't the only one to have broken his word!

We gonna "invade" the US now cos they broke their word? Na.. too silly! Back to the start... ya gotta "keep at it" with anyone like Saddam.. or the US.. or any nation that agrees to something and does not produce the goods until they do comply with promises/undertakings. Yea.. can bore the scull of ya in the meantime *g* But sure beats murdering thousands over some "agreement"! It's called "persistance".. and.. (hell, this is a first! *g*) .. gotta say George has put the pressure on there, and he *might* just pull it off....

10-07-2002, 10:50 PM
Webby Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Far far away - as possible Posts: 14,956	The quote above is from you Webby. We have talked for 11 years with the Iraqi government, and the UN, in an effort to get Iraq to abide by the agreements made after their military forces were defeated on the field of battle. How much longer do you suggest we talk before we act? As long as there is no "imminent danger" you talk as long as it takes. It has still not been established that there is, in fact, any danger from Iraq. All that has been said so far, is "words", - even the US Admin had to 'cool' some of the propaganda they issued... eg.. "terrorist cells working in Iraq" when the story was just not credible. (but hell.. there may well be!!g) .... If you are talking of broken promises... just take a look at the US Admin... in particular the current Admin .. they have broken so many promises and treaties ... signed many and then just filed them, never to be implimented. So, Saddam ain't the only one to have broken his word! We gonna "invade" the US now cos they broke their word? Na.. too silly! Back to the start... ya gotta "keep at it" with anyone like Saddam.. or the US.. or any nation that agrees to something and does not produce the goods until they do comply with promises/undertakings. Yea.. can bore the scull of ya in the meantime g But sure beats murdering thousands over some "agreement"! It's called "persistance".. and.. (hell, this is a first! g) .. gotta say George has put the pressure on there, and he might just pull it off....