Quote:
Originally posted by SextrafficPete
lets be realistic. we don't know what saddam is up to, but we do know he is up to some sort of trouble.
should we deal with him now or after he has done something to us?
how old is he? how many more years does he have to go? you don't think he wants to go out with a bang??
what are we going to do if he launches some bio chemical attack against the usa or another country, then thousands die, and we said no we didn' t want to attack him
then what? more people die?
the middle east has always been a big problem and needs to be dealt with. i don't approve of bush dealing with this fiasco, he is like a 5 yr old at a toy store.
someone needs to deal with the middle east, and put them in their place. everybody knows this, and it has to happen. wether bush should be the one is up to congress and the people of the world.
sure more people will die, but how many will be saved from future actions by saddam?
you've got to think about the future...you'll be here to expierence it , and your kids 
|
What exactly gives you the impression he is up to trouble? Several political analysts have discounted Blare's dossier on the Iraq situation as contain no real evidence, or should I say, no new evidence to suggest Suddam has been doing anything different than he has before this whole fiasco.
I'm not sure what you mean by putting the Middle East "in their place". They control the fuel that goes into your car, the plastics you use everyday, so I think, if anything, that the Middle East's "place" is in a position of power over the western world. Want this changed? Develop new forms of energy and materials and you can free yourself from the ties with the Middle East region.
This isn't directed at you, but rather than make a new post I will state it here. A lot of people have called into question the fact that Suddam is a dictator and that the people of Iraq dont want him in power. We all should know the fiasco that was the last United States elections. I'm not sure on exact details, but there was a lot of controversy about whether or not Bush was legally voted president, and the fact that the polls had the lowest turnout ever? Surely this isn't our beautiful democracy that we speak so highly of?