View Single Post
Old 10-05-2002, 04:06 PM  
Birdie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 39
Britneyspearsnude.com may be malicious beings it is a celebrity and someone wants to profit on the name.

But for those sites that have been bought say like barbiedollcollector.com ....with no intent on using the site for profit....someone who just collects dolls and offer a classified for others to communicate of dolls they have is not mailicious. Because there is no intent on profiting from the site.


of course that was an example. But for real even fan site sites ...band sites. If they are being bought for malicious purposes yes.....BUT the law is too broad in description.....it also says if your making a profit it's cybersquatting if not then it's not...

But yet they still want a name I have bought....with not malicious intent for profit. the law is too broad in what is allowed and what is not. and to the people who buy names not for malicious purposes always get screwed
__________________
The Little Bird Speaks!! Now Listen!!
Birdie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote