Originally Posted by lazycash

I'm a huge Suns and Steve Nash fan, but I don't think he should be MVP. It always come back to how you interpret what the MVP means. Just judging on pure talent and skill, Kobe and Lebron definitely should win. I believe the MVP title originally was meant to award the "best" player for that particular year, but after being scrutinized year after year it has come to mean more, "which player made his team better while displaying a high level of skill".

Sure the Suns had a great year even without Amare and that's why Nash has been mentioned for MVP all year. However, anyone who followed the Suns all year would know that Marion was just as vital to their success as Nash. http://www.azcentral.com/sports/chea...2main0413.html

I'm not a big Kobe fan, but what he did this year was incredible and its hard for me to believe the Lakers would have won very many games without him. I think if Cleveland would have finished stronger, Lebron would have been the front runner. Oh well, you could make a case for all of them, just comes down to how you interpret the MVP award.