How can you be at all conclusive on his theory.
First of all, the speed of light is a calculation of distance and time. The only thing that this theory can rely on is OUR interpretation/perspective of distance and time. IMHO to even remotely assume that this theory of relativaty could be true is a lack of thinking outside of the box. There are so many more variables that are not being considered in his theory. This theory was developed based on the concept that we live in 3 Dimensions.
He may have presented a better way of looking at things based on the existing knowledge at the time, but i think there are far too many holes to be able to consider his theory as accurate and true.
|