Quote:
|
Originally Posted by seven
I'm sorry to break it to you but my other statement didn't offer any arithmatic. If it did, since I did a double major in Math & Computer Science my arithmatic, it would've been far different than your arithmatic lol.
|
The arithmatic is implict, but I guess they don't offer a lot along the lines of common sense in the comp sci department. If you make more than $35 a join with revshare that means that they are making more than $70 a join, meaning a revshare model could afford PPS if they cared to.
Since you lack any sort of basic reading skills I'll say it again; all I've said is that the PPS model fall well within most PPS companies margins without any sort of creative business practices. Though I do find your statement here rather ironic:
Quote:
|
I guess just the word PPS written in affiliate area makes their site members horny and want to stay members forever and hence justifies that $50 per pop
|
So the second a company declares themselves revshare rebills and quality instantly of service goes up, but all the PPS copmanies are just out to get you?
More like the quality of a company is indepenant of what model they choose. In fact PPS companies in theory should be more motivated to provide all the nice long rebills and quality service you seem to think only exist in revshare as they take 100% of the profit not 50%. Just once I'd like to see you post something that has a conclusion which follows from the premise.
Quote:
|
Duh! Ok now you're admitting that you're arguing just cause you like to argue outta your ass not cause you tried to make a point that PPS makes more money. Ya know what that's called right? Hypocricy! Now, you're an Idiot and that's final
|
My inital point is that your comment regarding PPS models being unsustainable at $35 a join is just ignorant. Your response?
HAHA REVSHRE MAKES MORE MONIES NOOB.
I never once made a statment on which I thought was the better model in fact here's my exact quote, since you're a bit slow:
Quote:
Yea, the only time revshare makes sense is if:
%revshare * average gross rev\join > flat PPS payout.
AND
You don't mind the inferior cash flow model + care to take on the extra risk on your shoulders
|