Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Very good points. However completely wrong.

If porn had anything to do with lighting and focusing then getting it right would be so simple 10s of 1,000s could do it. Thankfully it's not about photography.

Porn is about stimulating a fantasy in the viewers brain, and nothing about photography. The fantasy can be different for so many people and needs a different approach to get right.

On a personal level I have always loved Buttman, Ben Dover and early Ed Powers. Yes I also like Suze Randall and Earl Miller but more for the photography than pornography.

And lastly if I had to rely on my photography skills to earn a living I would be broke.