View Single Post
Old 04-14-2006, 11:53 PM  
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by BV
If the revshare theory sucked then PPS would also.

PPS programs rely on rebills to make a profit.

So if an affiliate can afford to wait a little longer for his money, revshare will generate more $ for him. If it didn't then PPS business model wouldn't work and they would be broke. They know how much each member is worth to them on average. You think they are going to pay you more than that?

Remember:
Content is King! & Revshare is Better!
That's BS. I'll give an example. One sponsor I use has both options. Now I can get $30 per sale or 65% revshare. Actually I can get $32.50 per sale if I make 50 sales a week but I won't count that since this bonus isn't offered with revsahre. Anyways trial is $5 so 65% of $5 is $3.25 Monthly is $25 so 65% of that is $16.25. So let's do some math

IF

100% of trials recur( yeah right ) then 65% of those would have to recur for 2 months or more to break even or do better.

50% trials recur then 71% for 3 months 29% for 4 months.

25% trials recur( most realistic ) 42% have to recur for 6 months 58% recur for 7 months. Sorry that shit aint happening.

Only way revshare would work MAYBE is if I promoted the monthly only and that's only if I could get the same amount of sales as I would promoting the trial. And that's very doubtful. Revshare depends too much on getting that once in a blue moon guy who recurs for 3 years in a row. And who is too say I'm going to be alive in 3 years or that program will exist in 3 years.

Show me a sponsor that will pay me 100% of a trial 90% on recurring and can prove that at least 75% of trials convert to monthly then maybe a promote revshare.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote