Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Webby
In your dealings with etelegate, what country/jurisdiction did you think you were dealing with?
For an alleged third party processor - even before iBill allegedly passed over webmaster accounts - it's a weird setup, with supposed offices in Manchester UK and trying to hide under a maildrop in central London.
Got a nasty feeling the fingerprints of Gary Spaniak and his associates, consultants and investors are all over etelegate recently and smell another shuffling of corporate paperwork for which iBill, Galanis, Spaniak, Markley, Molina and are known for. This probably explains the lack of payments.
All of these individuals have been lying and decieving for years now in association with each other. The portrayed "press release" picture of iBill passing over accounts to a new magical processor is another load of bullshit.
Markley, Spaniak and associates know exactly who the owners of "etelegate" are.
Only my  but anyone who may still be stuck with iBill for any money - don't dream of permitting iBill to pass over accounting to any other processor. iBill is the company responsible for funds - no other company. I'd also not sign up with eTelegate until all details are known and when there is transparency. |
We stopped using iBill a long time ago because the 'new' iBill was just as sleazy as the old iBill (same runarounds and accumulating unpaid moneys for (new improved) gkard sales/reserves), but this switcheroo (to eTelegate) seems (IMO) like a convenient way to dump 8+ months worth of reserves owed to iBill/gkard webmasters and being able to continue business with (yet another) clean slate and probably enough corporate arms length distance to slip through criminal fraud prosecution for taking on new webmaster accounts knowing very well that they are not currently paying any outstanding reserves back (according to iBill rep because of bank dispute).
They are not informing the market that they are unable to release reserves even though they entering into new agreements with new webmasters most likely on the premise that they do.
That's just my opinion but it's based on what iBill has done and what they have told us regarding our unpaid reserves (for 2005 gkard sales).
I suspect I may not be alone in this view.
BTW, has anyone yet succeeded in launching criminal action against 'ibill' or whatever corporate tag they are hiding themselves behind?