|
If concepts can be formed at a certain time -- then concepts must also have a duration. Because if you have a starting of something there must also be an ending...
Start no stop =
1. Starting Never Stop
a. If you start and never stop, you are suggesting infinity. If infinity can exist then it can't just be in one direction -- it must consume all space and time simultaneously, for infinity as a concept must be all-inclusive of everything in order to exist as a concept. For infinity to exist, it must be infinite iself. Once you have suggested infinity -- you will not be able to suggest a partial infinity or a broken linear infinity such as a geometric "ray".
2. Never Stop Never Starting
We can prove that time does not exist because a line in infinite. In order for time to exist as a concept -- it must move in a linear fashion moving from beginning to end -- along an infinite "line"... But in order for there to be a hypothetical "experience" of time as a concept -- in order to realize it in our imagination as a concept -- it must encompass infinity... In a sense, time is timeless. Time has no time -- the reversal of opposites proving the infinity of error. The time of time defeats itself. If time can have no time -- then the time of time can have no time -- infinity. If time has time -- then time is timeless and then time again defeats itself.
Perhaps time created itself during the very first concept of Time by the infinity of this reversal -- time without time compressed infinitely in an infinite space with "timeless-ness" -- that being a hypothetical experience of "all time" staggered infinitely with segments of stop and start time that can be "experienced" by the common human mind.
(Note: Was there a first conception or a first to "conceive" of Time -- Stop Start -- the "Birth of Time" -- or was Time "fathered-in" by being always conceived -- in other words, Was Time always Time all of the time without a birth!? Imagine that if Time was never born -- could there be a God to Will Time into Existence?)
Let's get back to a concept formation as a ray of time -- something starting with no ending...
ray
n.
A thin line or narrow beam of light or other radiant energy.
A graphic or other representation of such a line.
Radiance; light.
A small amount; a trace: not a ray of hope left.
Mathematics. A straight line extending from a point. Also called half-line.
If a line extends to infinity, and suggests "everything" -- then the line must also include everything -- and so a half of everything is still everything and so a half of infinity can't exist -- a half of a line can't be a ray because a line is infinite by definition and so lines can't exist because there is the 3rd dimension which is an exclusion or inclusion of infinity -- and therefore the inclusion in your thinking of any visualized description/geometric descriptor with attached "infinity elements" must be useless for a wise person. Future thought on this matter?
Can a future exist as long as an infinity exists? Maybe there is no future and no past -- only a Now -- an eternal Now awareness within or without the grasp of our experience of reality -- or Life as we see it.
|