View Single Post
Old 04-12-2006, 11:16 PM  
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by sukime69
Everybody deserves to have a lawyer, but this looks terrible for our side if the chairman of the Free Speech Coalition takes on convicted kiddie pornographers as clients. He should get out of this case now.
i agree , its a slippery slope..

If the laws dont apply to everyone , its hardly fair ( even convicted people )

I dont think laws should change depending on who is being tried , you can change the penalty based on prior convictions but kind of hard to consider guilt based on prior actions..

but then again , if someone was convicted 20 times of credit card fraud and then is under suspicion of credit card fraud , should we need as much evidence to convict him as someone who has never been convicted ( with the assumption being because he did it before its obviously more likely he did it again )
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote