Greg B

Oh, you mean like these following stories? Both pro and con.

Who the fuck are you to call someone 'anti american' you asshat throwback. You're the one using a national symbol as a porn site screenname and used the graphics to promote your shit!

If you had read fully the main article I posted the scientists pointed out that we have not only results in now but it will take years to assess the full damage. Not only that but when you read the articles below you'll notice that because dogs age faster they're a better indicator of what may happen to humans. The 'official' studies concluded no ill health effects. But when you look at what the owners of the dogs say it's a different story. Last government examination was revealed in 2003 and then again in 2004. Now we have an new story saying more research should be done. Considering the constant fuck ups the official stories have to say going back 50 years I'll settle to make up my own mind based on what the witnesses and victims have to say.



http://www.unknownnews.net/040824rescuedogs.html

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/08/23/..._continued.php

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...evelations.htm


http://www.avma.org/press/releases/0...rveillance.asp

http://www.avma.org/press/releases/0...1_sar_dogs.asp

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medi...p?newsid=13434

http://www.upenn.edu/pennnews/article.php?id=670

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/07/19/bear.insurance/