Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kevsh
For existing webmasters, there's little doubt we'd make more if it were real lifetime revshare but the fact is that those that learn to work within the system they have do well.
Argue all you want about it being unfair, etc. etc.
As far as I know, there is no ISO standards for affiliate programs, just because they do it differently doesn't mean they are violating any written code. Some of you act like it's a personal affront to you that they do things against what you're used to!
If their system sucked so bad and was so unfair, why do they have so many happy webmasters? Everyone would just cut and run, sending their traffic somewhere else.
If you try them out, watch your sales for a few months and you really feel you're not making good coin, then bitch all you want. Otherwise, you are pretty much speaking out of ignorance.
|
Nobody is really saying anything about it being unfair, we are simply saying that it should be disclosed to the webmaster as part of their program. I agree, they are certainly able to run their program as they see fit, if you don't like it then don't promote it. If I sign up for any sponsor and promote their revshare option, then the assumption is that you will receive your cut of all recurring billing for life. Obviously because of this I won't be assuming anything anymore.