Ok, maybe they didn't find DNA at the crash site ... but did they find any DNA of the passengers at the Cleveland airport?
The point is: Is it easier to believe a plane exploded and no blood was found OR they managed to evacuate all passengers at a nearby airport, kill them all (with no evidence or witnesses to these killings), and nobody responsible in any way shape or form has come forward? Nor any tangible evidence besides claiming a plane landed there?
You using the improbability of no remains found as proof of a conspiracy is fairly valid until you suggest the alternative ... a far more unbelievable event in which there is far less evidence.
When the Loose Change boys get some concrete evidence of their theory, this is about as believable as aliens abducting Elvis.
|