View Single Post
Old 03-26-2006, 10:01 PM  
James Greuel
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 243
I hate to disagree

Yet Jeffrey Douglas posted on this board within the past month the following (a thread about Met-Art)

"Distribution of child pornography is a crime when it is _knowing and deliberate_. If you distribute a photograph of a model, when you believe in good faith that s/he is 18 years old, but the photographer provided you with false documentation and related assurances, you have committed no crime."


Then I hope Mr Douglas is your Judge, if you ever get prosecuted.

Another poster here made the comment that it's the same as having sex with a minor, even if she lied about her age and showed you a fake ID.

There is no belief, in good faith clause in either case.

Look, the Pros here have told you the way it is, if you think differently, then go pay a really good attorney (like we did) a lot of money, to hear the same thing we're telling you.

As for me, I believe Tod Foster (do a Google, in Florida) that's who I got my info from, and he put a lot of guys in jail over this. I don't know who Mr Douglas is, or his credentials.
James Greuel is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote