Quote:
|
Originally Posted by seven
In that case, you must also acknowledge much of koran reflects the historical contexts of its beginning days. When Muhammad, was persecuted in Mecca for the first thirteen years of his ministry, he was justified in his military actions in the last ten years of his life in Medina and for the support of the budding Islamic movement.
|
You haven't been paying attention to the thread. And now you come back and copy paste a bunch of things you don't understand.
The Quranic writings are not time-specific. Muslims believe them to be universal. So if Muslims are allowed to behead an infidel in the 7th century then they are allowed to do so in the 21st century and beyond.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by seven
Otherwise, in Chapter 60, verse 8 and 9 in the Koran, it clearly says that non-Muslims who are not fighting against Muslims or oppressing them are entitled to kind and just treatment.
|
And it states elsewhere that unless non-Muslims either submit to Islamic rule or sign a treaty with them (which is not binding on the Muslim side) then they are fair game for attack.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by seven
Also, in the koran, Chapter 2, verse 256, it says: let there be no compulsion in religion.
|
And elsewhere it says "if a Muslim discards his faith in Islam, kill him" and earlier in this thread I posted "3.85: And whoever desires a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted from him, and in the hereafter he shall be one of the losers."
So there IS a compulsion in religion after all. Strange how Allah keeps contradicting himself. Anyone would think that the Qur'an was just made up by Mohammed............
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by seven
Now, you forgot to mention that from your 3 times koran readings didn't you?  |
I'm sure you thought you were being clever, but do you keep getting owned because you are a teen webmaster or is it because of something more serious? I mean, if you're still in your teens then no one expects you to be a bastion of knowledge or worldliness, because as that age you should be more interested in the punani, but if you were 40 let's say, then you'd have a tougher job explaining why you are always wrong. People are supposed to get wiser with age.