Quote:
Originally posted by charly
Here is a real one.
How do they compare Dave?
Remember under the law it is the person publishing who has to have the documents. Some one altering, resizing, collating, editing the pictures. Who's door will the police knock on Web Legal or the publishers?
Ask your lawyer
"If I have pictures of a girl that looks under age and the documentation is suspect or the seller, of that picture, refuses to show me the documentation, should I publish them?"
Silly question really not worth paying a lawyer to ask something you know the answer too.
|
As stated before, the secondary producers portion of CFR 75 has been struck down in court. What is left, is pretty clear... 18 USC 2257 quite specifically states "but does not include mere distribution or any other activity which does not involve hiring, contracting for managing, or otherwise arranging for the participation of the performers depicted". That's pretty darn clear language to me.
I have requested a new set of documents from the publisher in question, and I'm awaiting that info now.