Quote:
|
Originally Posted by EdgeXXX
I have a better idea, instead of relying on some reporter to tell you his version of what it says, why don't you read the actual bills that are being proposed to Congress. Just because something is reported in print does not make it 100% factual and without bias.  |
Well, even assuming the reporter was entirely biased, and also misquoted the NRA, there's still the matter that any physical confrontation or possibility thereof can be perceived as a life-threatening situation, and that, therefore, they all warrant the use of "deadly force". So, no matter how biased the reporter may be, the argument stands.