Quote:
Originally posted by Chris R
I don't know trey, pimpdog, sexymail, or whatever - but:
1) NOT one of these posts has one shred of info that he has ripped off or scammed anyone.
2) NOT one shred of evidence has been posted that he has violated the law. You can't honestly say, because he put up some sort of exit console - that the person later changed to be child porn is breaking the law. You think google or overture or anyone else that sells traffic would get in trouble, because someone they sold traffic to LATER changed the content.
3) NOT one piece of evidence to show sending IM bots is in violation of MSNs rules. I tend to think there very well may be something against that, but you guys haven't posted it.
So far it is all - we hate trey and think he has ripped people off, is scum, or whatever.
As far as some acting all high and mighty, because kids might get access to that - get real. YOU ALL SELL PORN. KIDS SEE YOUR STUFF EVERYDAY.
http://www.bigfatporn.com/
you think the big enter text there is too hard for kids to figure out?
|
Nope, its quite easy to figure out... I cant wait to check to see how many type ins that domain got tho...
Might just to just work the search engines with fpa's like google... thats a better example, seeing as how kids use google more than they type in domains like that.
Against MSN's policies? Uhh, yes... it is.
Im still waiting for the spammer's lawyer to get in touch with me tho. =) I'm gonna have a field day, thinkin bout makin a reality site...
its gonna be "When spammers true to sue you for defamation, when they have have blatently admitted to doing the one thing that they want to sue you for defamation for, thus opening their business, their records, and their actions to further scrutiny through litigation..."
dunno what the domain should be though, any suggestions chris dear?
What a knight in shining armor you are... I think there's a cat stuck in a tree down the road, if you're interested.