I indeed believe that arguing about god is ilogical, but dude - you ain't using you logic too much as well...
You argument that all "evidence" in science point against the existance of god is a very silly point.
1. The belief in god is longer, more supported by the masses, more understood by people and - proven atleast as good as things like the big-bang.
2. Even "science" is disproved by science MANY times
3. Modern cience is based on axioms and "believes". Saying science "proves" things is ilogical.
4. If god exists, that sceince is his creation, including the disproving of god itself.
5. I wouldn't trust scientist with nothing. Look what happend to Apollo 13, Dolly's predacecors, Hiroshima/Nagasaki and Colgete/Palmolive products...
6. Atleast god does'nt do tests on bunnies and monkeys for the sole purpose of manufacturing shampoo.
I'll grant you that.. Believing in god, thinking he is so almighty and great, and then saying all he cares about is what people think of him... That sounds rediculous and pathetic..
BUT - after all, they say.... GOD WORKS IN MISTERIOUS WAYS
