Quote:
|
Originally Posted by punkworld
You refer to MET as a porn site. However, it is quite clear from the site that they call, and likely consider, themselves an art site. That changes the context entirely.
|
Really? If that's the case, then why are they processing with an HRIPSP?
If they were an art site, as you say, then there would certainly be no reason from a business standpoint to pay the fees to use a high risk processor. They would be using a non adult low risk processor for that.
If they were an art site, as you say, then there would be no reason for them to be listed on tgps or to have adult oriented affiliates, and certainly no reason for their attorney to be posting on a porn oriented board in regards to their site.
If they were an art site, as you say, then they would not need 2257 documentation for their models.
Do you want me to continue? I can. If you aren't associated with them, I'd stop trying to defend them. You're not making a case for them at all.