Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jeffrey J. Douglas
MET-Art has the highest end nude photography, and outstanding documentation of legal age. It is inevitable a jealous competitor or a jilted photographer seizes on the environmental paranoia and accuses the best of being the worst. The questions are: 1. Are you all going to fall for it? 2. Who are you going to turn to when some anonymous posting says the same thing about you?
JEFFREY J. DOUGLAS is a Santa Monica lawyer, representing all segments of the adult entertainment industry since 1982. He is Chair of the Board of Directors of the Free Speech Coalition, the trade association of the adult entertainment industry and Chairman Emeritus of the First Amendment Lawyers Association. A nationally recognized spokesperson for the adult entertainment industry, as well as an expert witness, Mr. Douglas appears regularly as a media commentator, and on invitation, has testified before Congress. He is the author of numerous magazine articles.
|
lets cut the shit .. we arent asking about legal advice so your opinion is not valid nor warranted.
Your trying to dodge the validity of the accusation by clouding it with your own lawyer drivel..
why dont we cut to the chase,, regardless of the "inactivity" of the links in question , the site has children nude on it . PERIOD it wasnt depictions, or an anonymous poster . I SAW THEM on MET-ART.COM it wasnt "maybe" or a thubmnail it was an obvious child.. so dont bother trying to cloud the issue here..
We realise you may have a legal right to display such images , it DOESNT mean we have to accept it or promote it..
The mere fact you trying to avoid the issue instead of taking a hard stance speaks volumes. i suggest you reword your statements to reflect the seriousness of the problem..
YOU had naked pictures of underage girls on your website , this is wrong , admit its wrong and it wont happen again , thats all people want to hear..