View Single Post
Old 03-13-2006, 09:13 PM  
pussyluver
Clueless OleMan
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ICQ - 169903487
Posts: 11,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Webby
Pulling traffic in by pandering to pedos - forgetting any laws, is offensive. Particularly when it's clearly known that mixing child "art" with porn is an obvious no no, irrespective of it's artistic value.

They all need thrown in jail without trial and stop trying to kid each other!
In the United sates we're suppose to have something called due process! To say just throw someone in jail without a trial is not what our constitution is about.

Different countries have different laws. What's legal in one place may well earn you you a jail sentence in another. I did not see the "art" in question, so I can't judge. The Internet clouds the issue for sure.

Mixing porn and art of nude children seems very unwise.

My parents took pictures of both my sister and me in the bathtub. Gee. we were nude. Was that porn? No, just embarrassing.

Met-art is known for erotic art. The key word here is erotic. IF you make that underage person seem erotic, is there a problem. Guess so in the US.

Am I going to trash met-art? Not now. Am I going to review the program? Of course.
pussyluver is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote