Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
lol because someone looks at it for other reasons makes it wrong.. ?
So if some sicko likes naked dogs and gets off on it , its wrong to post pictures of naked dogs..
Sorry , i understand where your coming from .. but there IS a time and a place for it ( not naked dogs thats just sick  ).. I'm not sure if you have kids , but if you do , you will understand.. I have a picture of my wife and my son as a baby NAKED on my wall , and i have sent it to family friends.. its artistic and i'm very proud of it..
WE ALL agree that regardless of the context of the pictures they shouldn't be on a porn site.. what your saying is there isn't any artisic merit in any pictures of naked children and that just isn't the case.. spin it however you want but thats life.. |
when a pedo looks at these artistic pictures it feeds his addiction. it may make him want to see more, or see a real child. if a sick person is turned on by looking at dogs or trees, this too may feed their problem. but if they look for beast porn or go fuck a tree, no one is really hurt. but if they go and look for cp or a real girl, that is a problem in which children really are hurt.
i do however understand your point, and it is well taken.