Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
OK it could be cantankerous
Cantankerous =
1. Ill-tempered and quarrelsome; disagreeable: disliked her cantankerous landlord.
|
Cantankerous, yes and ill be to the point here but before i do, i want to tell you i respect you and your work and think your a good giuy!
your talking about quality ect- your bitching and moaming about it just stems from you spending yrs learning the craft, paying dues and it pisses you off that any asshole can basically pick up a camera, video or otherwise, shoot a scene and sell it and make money where they normally wouldnt back in the old days.
this has taken money out of your pocket.
and of course your right for feeling that way!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
But is it true?
|
i agreed with you. i said 99% coudlnt cut it.
but that doesnt mean theres not a market for it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Yes a lot of people on the adult Internet work in the main stream, but that was not my statement. What I said was how many photographers (or videographers) sell their work in other parts of the porn industry?
|
- if its internet related prob alot - if its main stream prob not many.
reason being
the quality level for the net isnt as high a standard as mainstream.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Now look at other parts of the porn industry selling here.
I know of 2-3 Internet companies who have gone into the DVD market. How many DVD companies have come the other way?
|
that i dont know.
anyone know this? if so please elaborate!
but i will take a stab and do a comparison.
think about hustler playboy and penthouse.
they should be the giants of internet porn
but theyre not.
why?
antiquitaed marketing and the age of those people working at those companies is fucking them up.
cluelessness.
playboy got a clue when lensman approached them.