Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jayeff
Personal taste must be a strong element, but in the context of Paul's threads on this topic, I think most of us could filter the absolutely good and bad, and only quibble about which of the good was the best. In fact Paul's content is a good example, because since it has provided him with a good living for several years, not entirely due to his ummm... aggressive (?) marketing, there is obviously a sizeable audience out there for it. Yet for my taste most of his models and sets are very ordinary and his style of photography just doesn't work for me the way, say, whoever photographs a lot of the Medium Pimpin sets does.
|
Missed this and it's a very good comment and linked to what I'm driving at.
One of the reasons we sell so well, both on the Net and magazines, is the lack of competition. Look around and see who shoots similar on a regular basis. Max Candy and Aarron Matthews immediately come to mind and I'm sure there are more.
Now look at the POV, Reality, Amateur, etc. sector. How many sites/producers come to mind, to many I'm sure.
Now factor in supply and demand.
So many sites are boasting Exclusive and yet what they have is never exclusive to the
SURFER because the same content is on 1000 other sites. The same niche, style, action, etc. all that's different is the girl, location or dick she's sucking on.
But if you really want to retain members drive up his acceptance levels of porn. Porn is a drug, give him a stronger dose and you narrow his options on moving elsewhere. Lower the compression, increase the image/video size, shoot hotter porn, improve the site and where does he go?
Look at your car, computer or house. Will you be moving down or up market on choice?