|
Like this would ever pass anyways.
I have met several politicians in my life, mostly from California. Seems that nearly all of them are dog owners anyways. Strictly purebreeds to my eyes and well they also seemed to appreciate breeding them. This type of law would really go against a personal thing with them and that rarely happens.
As for those that think this is good, why? Do you always feel it is necessary to punish the responsible for what the irresponsible does?
Then if that is the case why can they not first go after cats? Dogs have more than enough regulations against them anyways that prevent them from wondering around out side of yards without leashes and such. Where as cats can roam freely and always seem to get knocked up a whole lot easier.
Lastly why run legitimate breeders out of business? Really does not seem all that fair that because some assholes can not control their own animals that others may have their own business stripped from them.
|