Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CDSmith
Is that so?
Acting like there's some surprise that there is some animosity and anger out there over this issue is what's ignorant my friend. Think about it. It's also a form of shallow thinking to get defensive over what I said. It in fact wouldn't surprise me one bit to find that some people might hold ibill and ANYONE affiliated with them as suspect.
All I said was that personally I would not want it known if I had been employed by them, that's all. It's your right to take exception to that of course, but I think you're being a tad oversensitive about it. If you're so innocent then why the need to get all defensive?
|
CD, I'm not getting defensive and I have never come on here and posted things I couldn't back up with evidence. There is no surprise at the animosity over this issue and I never showed surprise. In fact, I have as much animosity over this as anyone.
What you need to understand and realize is that there was over 300 people at iBill. Most of them worked their asses off for clients and as a result of that hard work alot of people made a lot of money. Out of the 300 employees, maybe a handful had any authority in making decisions at the level that impacted what happened. To hold anyone who worked there, regardless of what they did suspect is what is ignorant to me friend.