Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

i didnt give any reasoning , you must be quoting the wrong person . you quoted me stating FACTS..

FACT its more likely to get hit by lighting than shot in a store robbery by a robber

FACT i have never heard of a baby shot by a robber , but i have heard of babies being shot by cops/victims stray bullets..

Those facts have nothing to do with a court or a law , those are called facts , so im not sure why you would think FACTS = reasoning , and why they would be in court. what does the fact that lightning hits people more often than robbers shoot people have anything to do with court ?

It doesn't

The guy deserves to be in jail , and you seem to think that what i said somehow conflicts with that , well it doesnt . i still think the robber deserves jail , and he deserves to be shot in the head as far as im concerned. That has nothing to do with th irresponsobility of the store owner ..