Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CheeseFrog
hahah yeah, I'm sure that line of reasoning is gonna hold up in court  The perp lost. He's in jail now. Get over it. |
i didnt give any reasoning , you must be quoting the wrong person . you quoted me stating FACTS..
FACT its more likely to get hit by lighting than shot in a store robbery by a robber
FACT i have never heard of a baby shot by a robber , but i have heard of babies being shot by cops/victims stray bullets..
Those facts have nothing to do with a court or a law , those are called facts , so im not sure why you would think FACTS = reasoning , and why they would be in court. what does the fact that lightning hits people more often than robbers shoot people have anything to do with court ?
It doesn't
The guy deserves to be in jail , and you seem to think that what i said somehow conflicts with that , well it doesnt . i still think the robber deserves jail , and he deserves to be shot in the head as far as im concerned. That has nothing to do with th irresponsobility of the store owner ..