Quote:
Originally posted by XXXManager
"More lines of code to do the same thing" - wrong.
|
Dude it's simple. You take out all the extra syntax required for inheritance and you get fewer lines of code. Why do I need so many parent objects -- when I can compress all the methods into one object with no parent? If you need two objects to inherit the same parent -- you don't need OOP to solve that problem! All your parent objects will be converted into sequential instructions anyway! Code sequentially in the first place -- less code -- faster code.
Quote:
Proceduraly programming sux. Procedures is the nicest way to do things "un"nicely. OOP takes that ugliness and covers it.
OOP is not a syntax - its a way of thinking. Encapsulating (hiding the shit  ) is only one aspect of it.
|
Hate to inform you bro, but OOP is just procedural programming with lots of syntactical sugar added. Procedural programming is only ugly if you are using things like global variables and goto statements... And I never said that OOP wasn't "a way of thinking" -- it's just a dumb way of thinking.