Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Franck
If it was the same show you saw or not, that show already made about 100x as much sense as these websites Phoenix visits.
Let me see. Phoenix believes sites where people who have no clue about the moon, the equipment, nothing really simply take an example pic and say this is fake and that is fake. The show i saw discussed all these so called evidence why the landing was fake and proved it wrong. With ease. They were all very, very logical reasons.
Who makes more sense?
|
My point about the show I saw was, they debunked shit that should have never been passed for truth in the first place. They only went after the theories that no sane person would consider anyhow.
Aside from the absolutely retarded design of everything what I would personally question is how everything was protected for extreme heat and cold? How everything was protected from radiation? Were they expecting flat terrain when they put car tires on the Lunar Rover?
Now I'm not pretending to know either way on any of this, just pointing out some of the things I find interesting. The best way I can put it is this...
Say you never heard anything about people traveling to the moon in your life. It was never in the news etc. Then today the government announced that they had been to the moon decades ago when technology was subpar. As proof of this they show you the official photos from NASA that look like a 12 year old with a bad imagination drew. What would you think? Would you take it at face value no matter what because the gov said it?